Detection of Cyberbullying on Social Media Using Machine Learning

In this work, there is an argue for a focus on the latter problem for practical reasons. This project show that it is a much more challenging task, as the analysis of the language in the typical datasets shows that hate speech lacks unique, discriminative features and therefore is found in the ‘long tail’ in a dataset that is difficult to discover. Later in this project there is an propose of Deep Neural Network structures serving as feature extractors that are particularly effective for capturing the semantics of hate speech. These methods are evaluated on the largest collection of hate speech datasets based on Twitter, and are shown to be able to outperform state of the art by up to 6 percentage points in macro-average F1, or 9 percentage points in the more challenging case of identifying hateful content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63278/1530
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection of Cyberbullying on Social Media Using Machine Learning

G. V. Ramana, Asha Akula
1 citations
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
2.48
article

Detection of Cyberbullying on Social Media Using Machine Learning

G. V. Ramana, Asha Akula
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this work, there is an argue for a focus on the latter problem for practical reasons. This project show that it is a much more challenging task, as the analysis of the language in the typical datasets shows that hate speech lacks unique, discriminative features and therefore is found in the ‘long tail’ in a dataset that is difficult to discover. Later in this project there is an propose of Deep Neural Network structures serving as feature extractors that are particularly effective for capturing the semantics of hate speech. These methods are evaluated on the largest collection of hate speech datasets based on Twitter, and are shown to be able to outperform state of the art by up to 6 percentage points in macro-average F1, or 9 percentage points in the more challenging case of identifying hateful content.

Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringVol. 31(4)
Central Electronics Engineering Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.