The Assessment of Water Quality Forecasting Using AI-Based ML Algorithms

Water quality matters to people, animals, plants, ecosystems, and entities. Recent environmental damage and contamination have harmed water purity. Because they indicate water authenticity, the Water Quality Index (WQI) and Water Quality Classification (WQC) are difficult to predict. In this paper, KNN imputers improve many MLalgorithms for water quality prediction. The precision of current methods is not good enough. Additionally, there are missing values in the dataset that are currently accessible for study, and these missing values significantly impact the classifiers' performance. This paper proposes an automated water-quality prediction system that effectively handles missing data while achieving high forecast accuracy. Furthermore, the accuracy of the suggested approach is assessed in relation to that of four machine learning methods. BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and K-Nearest Neighbours are these approaches. These approaches model and predict water quality parameters such as DO, pH, NH3, NO3, and NO2. For the purpose of evaluating the accuracy of the various approaches to prediction, published data were utilized and for DO prediction, BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and KNN had Pearson correlation values of 0.60, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99. BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM had Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.56, 0.84, 0.99, and 0.57 for pH prediction. For NH3-N forecasting, BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM had Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.28, 0.88, 0.99, and 0.25. For NO3-N prediction, BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM obtained coefficients of correlation of 0.96, 0.87, 0.99, and 0.87. With correlation ratings of 0.87, 0.08, 0.99, and 0.75, BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM projected NO2-Ncorrelated coefficients. SVM was used to forecast water quality for groundwater-based industrial aquaculture systems. Most precise and reliable predictions were made with SVM. Both published and commercial aqua farming system data showed that the support vector machine (SVM) had the highest prediction accuracy, with 99% accuracy. For commercial farming water quality modeling and forecasting, utilize the SVM model.est.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63278/1539
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Assessment of Water Quality Forecasting Using AI-Based ML Algorithms

Shrikant V. Sonekar, S. P. Zade, Kuan Tak Tan, Sivaneasan Bala Krishnan et al.
1 citations
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
0.80
article

The Assessment of Water Quality Forecasting Using AI-Based ML Algorithms

Shrikant V. Sonekar, S. P. Zade, Kuan Tak Tan, Sivaneasan Bala Krishnan, L. V. Subba Rao, Pravin R.K. shirsagar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Water quality matters to people, animals, plants, ecosystems, and entities. Recent environmental damage and contamination have harmed water purity. Because they indicate water authenticity, the Water Quality Index (WQI) and Water Quality Classification (WQC) are difficult to predict. In this paper, KNN imputers improve many MLalgorithms for water quality prediction. The precision of current methods is not good enough. Additionally, there are missing values in the dataset that are currently accessible for study, and these missing values significantly impact the classifiers' performance. This paper proposes an automated water-quality prediction system that effectively handles missing data while achieving high forecast accuracy. Furthermore, the accuracy of the suggested approach is assessed in relation to that of four machine learning methods. BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and K-Nearest Neighbours are these approaches. These approaches model and predict water quality parameters such as DO, pH, NH3, NO3, and NO2. For the purpose of evaluating the accuracy of the various approaches to prediction, published data were utilized and for DO prediction, BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and KNN had Pearson correlation values of 0.60, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99. BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM had Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.56, 0.84, 0.99, and 0.57 for pH prediction. For NH3-N forecasting, BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM had Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.28, 0.88, 0.99, and 0.25. For NO3-N prediction, BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM obtained coefficients of correlation of 0.96, 0.87, 0.99, and 0.87. With correlation ratings of 0.87, 0.08, 0.99, and 0.75, BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM projected NO2-Ncorrelated coefficients. SVM was used to forecast water quality for groundwater-based industrial aquaculture systems. Most precise and reliable predictions were made with SVM. Both published and commercial aqua farming system data showed that the support vector machine (SVM) had the highest prediction accuracy, with 99% accuracy. For commercial farming water quality modeling and forecasting, utilize the SVM model.est.

Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringVol. 31(4)
University of Engineering & Management (IN), Deccan College of Medical Sciences (IN), Singapore Institute of Technology (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Global College (CY), Institution of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineers (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.