Simulating mismatch between calibration and target population in AI for mammography the retrospective VAIB study

AI cancer detection models require calibration to attain the desired balance between cancer detection rate (CDR) and false positive rate. In this study, we simulate the impact of six types of mismatches between the calibration population and the clinical target population, by creating purposefully non-representative datasets to calibrate AI for clinical settings. Mismatching the acquisition year between healthy and cancer-diagnosed screening participants led to a distortion in CDR between -3% to +19%. Mismatching age led to a distortion in CDR between -0.2% to +27%. Mismatching breast density distribution led to a distortion in CDR between +1% to 16%. Mismatching mammography vendors lead to a distortion in CDR between -32% to + 33%. Mismatches between calibration population and target clinical population lead to clinically important deviations. It is vital for safe clinical AI integration to ensure that important aspects of the calibration population are representative of the target population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01623-0
Citations
4
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulating mismatch between calibration and target population in AI for mammography the retrospective VAIB study

Tae Yang Choi, Haiko Schurz, Magnus Dustler, Claes Lundström et al.
4 citations
npj Digital Medicine
AI in cancer detection
9.92
article

Simulating mismatch between calibration and target population in AI for mammography the retrospective VAIB study

Tae Yang Choi, Haiko Schurz, Magnus Dustler, Claes Lundström, Sophia Zackrisson, Fredrik Strand, Håkan Gustafsson, Fernando Cossío, Klara Solander, Davida Åström
article en
4 citations

Abstract

AI cancer detection models require calibration to attain the desired balance between cancer detection rate (CDR) and false positive rate. In this study, we simulate the impact of six types of mismatches between the calibration population and the clinical target population, by creating purposefully non-representative datasets to calibrate AI for clinical settings. Mismatching the acquisition year between healthy and cancer-diagnosed screening participants led to a distortion in CDR between -3% to +19%. Mismatching age led to a distortion in CDR between -0.2% to +27%. Mismatching breast density distribution led to a distortion in CDR between +1% to 16%. Mismatching mammography vendors lead to a distortion in CDR between -32% to + 33%. Mismatches between calibration population and target clinical population lead to clinically important deviations. It is vital for safe clinical AI integration to ensure that important aspects of the calibration population are representative of the target population.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Linköping University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Malmö University (SE), Lund University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Sectra (Sweden) (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Cancerfonden, Karolinska Institutet, Vetenskapsrådet, Emil och Wera Cornells Stiftelse
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
AI in cancer detection
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.