Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Periprosthetic Fractures Between Cemented vs Cementless Stem Methods After Initial Total Hip Arthroplasty or Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty: A Multicenter Analysis (TRON Study)
Among patients who underwent THA or BHA, mortality and bone union following treatment of PFFs did not differ between cemented and cementless stems. However, patients who underwent BHA with cementless stems required longer operations and lost more blood. Type B fractures requiring revision occurred more frequently with cementless stems, whereas Type C fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation were more frequent with cemented stems, which thus influenced perioperative factors. Cement use for initial arthroplasty was associated with certain favorable characteristics and positive treatment outcomes of PFFs.
Authors
- Shiro Imagama (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6951-8575)
- Toshiaki Okura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6082-2327)
- Katsuhiro Tokutake (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-215X)
- Kenichi Mishima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3350-1664)
- Yasuhiko Takegami (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9279-8301)
- Hiroaki Nakashima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0039-9678)
- Takehiro Kasai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3651-7939)
- Hiroaki Tachi
Institutions
- Konan Kosei Hospital (JP)
- Chubu Rosai Hospital (JP)
- Nagoya University (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Arthroplasty Today
- Published
- 2025-05-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2025.101699
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.01