Well-Being and Human Enhancement: A Natural-Law Perspective

Abstract In this paper, I explore some general ethical questions raised by potential human enhancement technologies from a natural-law perspective. I begin by distinguishing between various types of enhancement, with a focus on what I term “radical enhancement.” These are enhancements that would improve human capacities beyond those that have ever been possessed by any human being. Next, I offer a brief account of the basic tenets of natural-law theory, with an emphasis on the roles of practical reason and basic human goods. I then argue that natural law offers some broad constraints on the sorts of enhancements it would be permissible to pursue. However, I ultimately claim that some enhancements could actually provide access to distinct instances of basic human goods that would otherwise be inaccessible to us. Therefore, it would not only be permissible to pursue such enhancements, but we would even have good reason to do so.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbaf003
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Well-Being and Human Enhancement: A Natural-Law Perspective

James J. Delaney
1 citations
Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
1.43
article

Well-Being and Human Enhancement: A Natural-Law Perspective

James J. Delaney
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I explore some general ethical questions raised by potential human enhancement technologies from a natural-law perspective. I begin by distinguishing between various types of enhancement, with a focus on what I term “radical enhancement.” These are enhancements that would improve human capacities beyond those that have ever been possessed by any human being. Next, I offer a brief account of the basic tenets of natural-law theory, with an emphasis on the roles of practical reason and basic human goods. I then argue that natural law offers some broad constraints on the sorts of enhancements it would be permissible to pursue. However, I ultimately claim that some enhancements could actually provide access to distinct instances of basic human goods that would otherwise be inaccessible to us. Therefore, it would not only be permissible to pursue such enhancements, but we would even have good reason to do so.

Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical MoralityVol. 31(2)
Niagara University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.