There was coordinated inauthentic user behavior in the COVID-19 German X-discourse, but did it really matter?

This study examines the role of coordinated inauthentic user behavior (CIUB) in the German COVID-19 discourse, focusing on the # nocovid hashtag. We analyze CIUB in relation to three dimensions of social media: communication, networks, and platforms. While our findings confirm the presence of coordinated behavior within the discourse, our analysis shows that CIUB itself did not significantly influence the debate. Instead, platform policies appear to have played a crucial role in shaping engagement by selectively amplifying or suppressing specific viewpoints. Using Granger causality analysis, we demonstrate that coordinated activity does not drive non-coordinated discourse. Conversely, an analysis of platform effects reveals that X’s algorithm systematically limited the visibility of anti- nocovid viewpoints. These findings highlight the need to reassess concerns about the influence of CIUB, shifting focus toward the role of platform policies in structuring online debates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1510144
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

There was coordinated inauthentic user behavior in the COVID-19 German X-discourse, but did it really matter?

Simon Hegelich, Habiba Sarhan
Frontiers in Communication
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

There was coordinated inauthentic user behavior in the COVID-19 German X-discourse, but did it really matter?

Simon Hegelich, Habiba Sarhan
article en

Abstract

This study examines the role of coordinated inauthentic user behavior (CIUB) in the German COVID-19 discourse, focusing on the # nocovid hashtag. We analyze CIUB in relation to three dimensions of social media: communication, networks, and platforms. While our findings confirm the presence of coordinated behavior within the discourse, our analysis shows that CIUB itself did not significantly influence the debate. Instead, platform policies appear to have played a crucial role in shaping engagement by selectively amplifying or suppressing specific viewpoints. Using Granger causality analysis, we demonstrate that coordinated activity does not drive non-coordinated discourse. Conversely, an analysis of platform effects reveals that X’s algorithm systematically limited the visibility of anti- nocovid viewpoints. These findings highlight the need to reassess concerns about the influence of CIUB, shifting focus toward the role of platform policies in structuring online debates.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 10
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

There was coordinated inauthentic user behavior in the COVID-19 German X-discourse, but did it really matter? — Simon Hegelich, Habiba Sarhan · Frontiers in Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS