Longitudinal changes in science identity, research self-efficacy, and academic self-concept for biomedical research trainees at a Hispanic-serving institution

Introduction This manuscript explores the development of key academic indicators among underrepresented minority students engaged in biomedical research training. Focusing on research trainees at a minority-majority Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI), the study examines the structural changes and co-variation in student reported measures of science identity, research self-efficacy, and academic self-concept over two time points, spanning the begining and conclusion of research training in biomedical sciences. Methods Using Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) models, the analysis obtained from biomedical research trainees models changes in the associations between these indicators. The study also investigates how network structure varies by gender and ethnicity, in order to examine any differences in the experiences of male, female, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic students undergoing biomedical research training at an HSI. Results The analysis reveals important differences in the experiences of male, female, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic students undergoing research training at an HSI. The findings underscore the importance of these constructs in shaping student success, particularly noting the positive relationship between research self-efficacy and science identity. Discussion The findings offer insights for fostering minority student retention and success in STEMM fields by highlighting the role of science identity and research self-efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518726
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal changes in science identity, research self-efficacy, and academic self-concept for biomedical research trainees at a Hispanic-serving institution

Angélica Monárrez, Amy Wagler, Clarissa Reyes
Frontiers in Education
Career Development and Diversity
article

Longitudinal changes in science identity, research self-efficacy, and academic self-concept for biomedical research trainees at a Hispanic-serving institution

Angélica Monárrez, Amy Wagler, Clarissa Reyes
article en

Abstract

Introduction This manuscript explores the development of key academic indicators among underrepresented minority students engaged in biomedical research training. Focusing on research trainees at a minority-majority Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI), the study examines the structural changes and co-variation in student reported measures of science identity, research self-efficacy, and academic self-concept over two time points, spanning the begining and conclusion of research training in biomedical sciences. Methods Using Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) models, the analysis obtained from biomedical research trainees models changes in the associations between these indicators. The study also investigates how network structure varies by gender and ethnicity, in order to examine any differences in the experiences of male, female, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic students undergoing biomedical research training at an HSI. Results The analysis reveals important differences in the experiences of male, female, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic students undergoing research training at an HSI. The findings underscore the importance of these constructs in shaping student success, particularly noting the positive relationship between research self-efficacy and science identity. Discussion The findings offer insights for fostering minority student retention and success in STEMM fields by highlighting the role of science identity and research self-efficacy.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
University of Texas at El Paso
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.