To empathize with a group or an individual? Investigating the role of cognitive cost and distress in empathy choice

Why do we feel empathy in certain situations, but not others? Previous research has found that people often avoid empathizing when perceived as costly. This study aims to replicate and extend these findings by investigating whether the choice to empathize differs between a group or an individual. Following the empathy selection task paradigm, participants ( N = 296) in a within-subject experiment made a series of free choices (empathy choice) selecting whether to engage in empathy or stay objective concerning a single individual and a group of individuals. They also rated perceived cognitive cost and distress concerning empathizing and staying objective. The results show that participants chose to remain objective more often than empathizing in the individual condition along with rating high levels of cognitive effort and distress. In contrast, participants in the group condition more often chose to empathize despite also rating it as more effortful and distressing. We discuss the importance of contextual factors as a main contributor to the difference in empathy choice between group and individual targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1519113
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To empathize with a group or an individual? Investigating the role of cognitive cost and distress in empathy choice

Hajdi Moche, Daniel Västfjäll, Ulrika Noryd, Sara Rydén
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

To empathize with a group or an individual? Investigating the role of cognitive cost and distress in empathy choice

Hajdi Moche, Daniel Västfjäll, Ulrika Noryd, Sara Rydén
article en

Abstract

Why do we feel empathy in certain situations, but not others? Previous research has found that people often avoid empathizing when perceived as costly. This study aims to replicate and extend these findings by investigating whether the choice to empathize differs between a group or an individual. Following the empathy selection task paradigm, participants ( N = 296) in a within-subject experiment made a series of free choices (empathy choice) selecting whether to engage in empathy or stay objective concerning a single individual and a group of individuals. They also rated perceived cognitive cost and distress concerning empathizing and staying objective. The results show that participants chose to remain objective more often than empathizing in the individual condition along with rating high levels of cognitive effort and distress. In contrast, participants in the group condition more often chose to empathize despite also rating it as more effortful and distressing. We discuss the importance of contextual factors as a main contributor to the difference in empathy choice between group and individual targets.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Linköping University (SE), Decision Research (US)
Vetenskapsrådet
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To empathize with a group or an individual? Investigating the role of cognitive cost and distress in empathy choice — Hajdi Moche, Daniel Västfjäll, et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS