Adhesive Tape versus Subcuticular Suture in Skin Closure during Cesarean Section

Background: The goal of any skin closure technique is to perfectly and tension-free oppose the skin's edges for a long enough period of time to allow for healing. Objectives: This study aimed to compare closure of skin incision of Cesarean section by adhesive tape closure system (Steristrip ® 3M Health Care) versus the traditional subcuticular method using (Prolene 2-0 ETHICON®). Patients and methods: A randomized controlled study that included 284 females above 18 years of age who underwent first Cesarean section with pfannensteil incision. They were randomly assigned into two equal groups, the first group skin closure by the adhesive tape closure system and the second group for skin closure by the traditional subcuticular closure technique Data were collected and tabulated. Results: There was statistically significant difference between adhesive tape group and subcuticular suture group regarding duration of skin closure (<0.001). There was also significant difference in occurrence of postoperative pain (<0.001) according to Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale. Conclusion: Both techniques were able to restore the physical integrity and function of the skin. However, there was a statistically significant difference (improvement) in pain score in adhesive tape closure system group.

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2025.425548
Primary Topic
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adhesive Tape versus Subcuticular Suture in Skin Closure during Cesarean Section

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
article

Adhesive Tape versus Subcuticular Suture in Skin Closure during Cesarean Section

article en

Abstract

Background: The goal of any skin closure technique is to perfectly and tension-free oppose the skin's edges for a long enough period of time to allow for healing. Objectives: This study aimed to compare closure of skin incision of Cesarean section by adhesive tape closure system (Steristrip ® 3M Health Care) versus the traditional subcuticular method using (Prolene 2-0 ETHICON®). Patients and methods: A randomized controlled study that included 284 females above 18 years of age who underwent first Cesarean section with pfannensteil incision. They were randomly assigned into two equal groups, the first group skin closure by the adhesive tape closure system and the second group for skin closure by the traditional subcuticular closure technique Data were collected and tabulated. Results: There was statistically significant difference between adhesive tape group and subcuticular suture group regarding duration of skin closure (<0.001). There was also significant difference in occurrence of postoperative pain (<0.001) according to Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale. Conclusion: Both techniques were able to restore the physical integrity and function of the skin. However, there was a statistically significant difference (improvement) in pain score in adhesive tape closure system group.

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital MedicineVol. 99(1)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.