Abstract: Drivers of Meaningful Research among Medical Students: Insights from a Mixed Methods Study. Accepted abstract in the 1st International conference of biomedical informatics and medical statistics: paving the way for research Excellence, 17th

Background: Research is a critical competency for physicians, yet medical students face varying motivations and barriers to engagement. Understanding these factors is essential for designing effective educational interventions to foster meaningful research participation.Objectives: This study aimed to explore the primary drivers and barriers influencing medical students' engagement in research, with a focus on motivations, perceptions, and the role of mentorship and curriculum design.Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, including a survey of 379 medical students and focus group discussions. The survey assessed motivations for learning research methodology, while focus groups explored perceptions of research culture and interest influences. Quantitative data were analyzed for statistical significance, and thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative responses.Results: Quantitative findings revealed that residency requirements (60%) and personal interest (30%) were the top motivators for research engagement, with community pressure influencing 12% of students, particularly females from certain backgrounds. Qualitative themes highlighted the importance of positive peer role models, early exposure, and recognition as key factors. Barriers included insufficient role models (40% reported no research instructors) and a muted research culture. Additionally, 50% of students reported struggles with the complexity of the research curriculum, and 65% had not participated in research projects. Despite these challenges, 80% of students strongly agreed (score of 5 on a 0-5 scale) that medical students need to learn scientific research.Conclusion: While extrinsic motivators like residency requirements dominate, intrinsic factors such as personal interest and community expectations also play significant roles. Barriers such as lack of mentorship and curriculum complexity hinder engagement. Peer mentorship, hands-on opportunities, and showcasing accomplishments can foster meaningful research participation. A multi-pronged approach leveraging social connections and community engagement is recommended to cultivate self-driven research engagement among medical students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Medical Research Institute /Journal of Medical Research Institute
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/jmalexu.2025.424771
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract: Drivers of Meaningful Research among Medical Students: Insights from a Mixed Methods Study. Accepted abstract in the 1st International conference of biomedical informatics and medical statistics: paving the way for research Excellence, 17th

Mahmoud Bassiony
Journal of the Medical Research Institute /Journal of Medical Research Institute
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Abstract: Drivers of Meaningful Research among Medical Students: Insights from a Mixed Methods Study. Accepted abstract in the 1st International conference of biomedical informatics and medical statistics: paving the way for research Excellence, 17th

Mahmoud Bassiony
article en

Abstract

Background: Research is a critical competency for physicians, yet medical students face varying motivations and barriers to engagement. Understanding these factors is essential for designing effective educational interventions to foster meaningful research participation.Objectives: This study aimed to explore the primary drivers and barriers influencing medical students' engagement in research, with a focus on motivations, perceptions, and the role of mentorship and curriculum design.Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, including a survey of 379 medical students and focus group discussions. The survey assessed motivations for learning research methodology, while focus groups explored perceptions of research culture and interest influences. Quantitative data were analyzed for statistical significance, and thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative responses.Results: Quantitative findings revealed that residency requirements (60%) and personal interest (30%) were the top motivators for research engagement, with community pressure influencing 12% of students, particularly females from certain backgrounds. Qualitative themes highlighted the importance of positive peer role models, early exposure, and recognition as key factors. Barriers included insufficient role models (40% reported no research instructors) and a muted research culture. Additionally, 50% of students reported struggles with the complexity of the research curriculum, and 65% had not participated in research projects. Despite these challenges, 80% of students strongly agreed (score of 5 on a 0-5 scale) that medical students need to learn scientific research.Conclusion: While extrinsic motivators like residency requirements dominate, intrinsic factors such as personal interest and community expectations also play significant roles. Barriers such as lack of mentorship and curriculum complexity hinder engagement. Peer mentorship, hands-on opportunities, and showcasing accomplishments can foster meaningful research participation. A multi-pronged approach leveraging social connections and community engagement is recommended to cultivate self-driven research engagement among medical students.

Journal of the Medical Research Institute /Journal of Medical Research InstituteVol. 46(1)
Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.