Context Evaluation in Nanotechnology Courses: A Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Model Perspective

This study aims to evaluate aspects of the project-based nanotechnology lecture context to understand the description of the background conditions and course requirements that support the effectiveness and relevance of the curriculum applied to learning. The evaluation model used is Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP), with a qualitative analysis design for documents such as Semester Learning Plans (SLP) and learning outcomes assessments. The evaluation results show that the existing curriculum and learning outcomes instruments do not fully reflect the needs of the growing nanotechnology industry. These findings indicate a mismatch between learning outputs and industry expectations, suggesting the need for regular curriculum updates and the integration of real applications and industry cases in teaching methods. Obstacles faced include students still not being familiar with the application of project-based laboratory inquiry learning and a lack of related knowledge. This study provides recommendations for strategic improvements in the curriculum aimed at increasing the relevance and effectiveness of nanotechnology learning, in line with the latest innovations and developments in the field.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17509/ijotis.v5i1.83191
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Context Evaluation in Nanotechnology Courses: A Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Model Perspective

Nahadi Nahadi, Nuryani Rustaman, Siti Sriyati, Ida Kaniawati et al.
1 citations
Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science
Big Data and Business Intelligence
0.53
article

Context Evaluation in Nanotechnology Courses: A Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Model Perspective

Nahadi Nahadi, Nuryani Rustaman, Siti Sriyati, Ida Kaniawati, Risti Ragadhita
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate aspects of the project-based nanotechnology lecture context to understand the description of the background conditions and course requirements that support the effectiveness and relevance of the curriculum applied to learning. The evaluation model used is Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP), with a qualitative analysis design for documents such as Semester Learning Plans (SLP) and learning outcomes assessments. The evaluation results show that the existing curriculum and learning outcomes instruments do not fully reflect the needs of the growing nanotechnology industry. These findings indicate a mismatch between learning outputs and industry expectations, suggesting the need for regular curriculum updates and the integration of real applications and industry cases in teaching methods. Obstacles faced include students still not being familiar with the application of project-based laboratory inquiry learning and a lack of related knowledge. This study provides recommendations for strategic improvements in the curriculum aimed at increasing the relevance and effectiveness of nanotechnology learning, in line with the latest innovations and developments in the field.

Indonesian Journal of Teaching in ScienceVol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Context Evaluation in Nanotechnology Courses: A Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Model Perspective — Nahadi Nahadi, Nuryani Rustaman, et al. · Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS