Democratic instability in post-colonial Zimbabwe and Pakistan: a comparative analysis

This study examines democratic instability in Zimbabwe and Pakistan through a detailed analysis of historical, political, economic, and social factors with the aim of explaining the underlying causes of democratic instability in these countries. Using a qualitative approach, the research conducts documentary reviews as part of the literature review to gather relevant data. Data was collected from online databases to provide a diverse range of perspectives. The documents were selected based on their relevance to the research objectives and their authenticity, credibility, and representativeness of various viewpoints. The findings indicate that military intervention, corruption, electoral authoritarianism, constitutional crises, the resource curse, and foreign influence significantly contribute to democratic instability in Zimbabwe and Pakistan. Military interference in civilian governance, corruption within governance structures, and flawed electoral processes have eroded democratic principles and diminished public trust in institutions. Additionally, the historical legacies of colonialism, power struggles among political elites, dependence on natural resources, and societal tensions further complicate governance challenges. The study concludes that addressing these issues requires coordinated efforts to strengthen democratic institutions, improve transparency and accountability, and promote inclusive governance. The research indicates that postcolonial countries can attain lasting democratic stability and social equity by implementing these strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2496439
Primary Topic
African studies and sociopolitical issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratic instability in post-colonial Zimbabwe and Pakistan: a comparative analysis

Mokgadi Molope, Shahid Minhas, Blessing Magocha
Cogent Social Sciences
African studies and sociopolitical issues
article

Democratic instability in post-colonial Zimbabwe and Pakistan: a comparative analysis

Mokgadi Molope, Shahid Minhas, Blessing Magocha
article en

Abstract

This study examines democratic instability in Zimbabwe and Pakistan through a detailed analysis of historical, political, economic, and social factors with the aim of explaining the underlying causes of democratic instability in these countries. Using a qualitative approach, the research conducts documentary reviews as part of the literature review to gather relevant data. Data was collected from online databases to provide a diverse range of perspectives. The documents were selected based on their relevance to the research objectives and their authenticity, credibility, and representativeness of various viewpoints. The findings indicate that military intervention, corruption, electoral authoritarianism, constitutional crises, the resource curse, and foreign influence significantly contribute to democratic instability in Zimbabwe and Pakistan. Military interference in civilian governance, corruption within governance structures, and flawed electoral processes have eroded democratic principles and diminished public trust in institutions. Additionally, the historical legacies of colonialism, power struggles among political elites, dependence on natural resources, and societal tensions further complicate governance challenges. The study concludes that addressing these issues requires coordinated efforts to strengthen democratic institutions, improve transparency and accountability, and promote inclusive governance. The research indicates that postcolonial countries can attain lasting democratic stability and social equity by implementing these strategies.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 11(1)
RMIT Vietnam (VN), North-West University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
African studies and sociopolitical issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.