How do text type, prior vocabulary knowledge, and working memory capacity affect second language incidental vocabulary learning through reading?

Incidental vocabulary learning through reading may be influenced by a range of learner-internal as well as learner-external factors. This study, specifically, examined the potential impacts of three factors: text type, prior L2 vocabulary knowledge, and working memory capacity. Forty-six 1st grade high school students in Korea completed a battery of tests: (a) the Vocabulary Levels Test and (b) a reading span task as measures of prior vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity, respectively. All the participants read two texts (one narrative and one expository) containing pseudowords and completed two reading comprehension tasks. Immediately after reading and again two days later, two measures of vocabulary gains were administered: (a) a form recognition test and (b) a meaning recognition test. The results revealed that the narrative text was more effective in aiding L2 vocabulary acquisition in the long term than the expository text. Both prior vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity played facilitative roles in the lexical inferencing process and retention, but working memory capacity had much stronger effects throughout all the posttests. A significant interaction between text type and working memory capacity was also observed, suggesting that the text type effective for incidental learning differed according to learners’ individual differences in language learning aptitude. Some implications for designing the classes that implement incidental vocabulary learning are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.33236
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do text type, prior vocabulary knowledge, and working memory capacity affect second language incidental vocabulary learning through reading?

Sang-Ki Lee, Sothea Lim
2 citations
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
6.89
article

How do text type, prior vocabulary knowledge, and working memory capacity affect second language incidental vocabulary learning through reading?

Sang-Ki Lee, Sothea Lim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Incidental vocabulary learning through reading may be influenced by a range of learner-internal as well as learner-external factors. This study, specifically, examined the potential impacts of three factors: text type, prior L2 vocabulary knowledge, and working memory capacity. Forty-six 1st grade high school students in Korea completed a battery of tests: (a) the Vocabulary Levels Test and (b) a reading span task as measures of prior vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity, respectively. All the participants read two texts (one narrative and one expository) containing pseudowords and completed two reading comprehension tasks. Immediately after reading and again two days later, two measures of vocabulary gains were administered: (a) a form recognition test and (b) a meaning recognition test. The results revealed that the narrative text was more effective in aiding L2 vocabulary acquisition in the long term than the expository text. Both prior vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity played facilitative roles in the lexical inferencing process and retention, but working memory capacity had much stronger effects throughout all the posttests. A significant interaction between text type and working memory capacity was also observed, suggesting that the text type effective for incidental learning differed according to learners’ individual differences in language learning aptitude. Some implications for designing the classes that implement incidental vocabulary learning are discussed.

Studies in Second Language Learning and TeachingVol. 15(3)
Korea National University of Education (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.