Acoustic Realism of Clinical Speech-in-Noise Testing: Parameter Ranges of Speech-Likeness, Interaural Coherence, and Interaural Differences

Speech-in-noise testing is a valuable component of audiological examination that can provide estimates of a listener's ability to communicate in their everyday life. It has long been recognized, however, that the acoustics of real-world environments are complex and variable and not well represented by a typical clinical test setup. The first aim of this study was to quantify real-world environments in terms of several acoustic parameters that may be relevant for speech understanding (namely speech-likeness, interaural coherence, and interaural time and level differences). Earlier acoustic analyses of binaural recordings in natural environments were extended to binaural re-creations of natural environments that included conversational speech embedded in recorded backgrounds and allowed a systematic manipulation of signal-to-noise ratio. The second aim of the study was to examine these same parameters in typical clinical speech-in-noise tests and consider the "acoustic realism" of such tests. We confirmed that the parameter spaces of natural environments are poorly covered by those of the most commonly used clinical test with one frontal loudspeaker. We also demonstrated that a simple variation of the clinical test, which uses two spatially separated loudspeakers to present speech and noise, leads to better coverage of the parameter spaces of natural environments. Overall, the results provide a framework for characterizing different listening environments that may guide future efforts to increase the real-world relevance of clinical speech-in-noise testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Hearing
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165251336625
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acoustic Realism of Clinical Speech-in-Noise Testing: Parameter Ranges of Speech-Likeness, Interaural Coherence, and Interaural Differences

H. Steven Colburn, S. Theo Goverts, J. Christopher Bouwmeester, Cas Smits et al.
1 citations
Trends in Hearing
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
article

Acoustic Realism of Clinical Speech-in-Noise Testing: Parameter Ranges of Speech-Likeness, Interaural Coherence, and Interaural Differences

H. Steven Colburn, S. Theo Goverts, J. Christopher Bouwmeester, Cas Smits, Virginia Best
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Speech-in-noise testing is a valuable component of audiological examination that can provide estimates of a listener's ability to communicate in their everyday life. It has long been recognized, however, that the acoustics of real-world environments are complex and variable and not well represented by a typical clinical test setup. The first aim of this study was to quantify real-world environments in terms of several acoustic parameters that may be relevant for speech understanding (namely speech-likeness, interaural coherence, and interaural time and level differences). Earlier acoustic analyses of binaural recordings in natural environments were extended to binaural re-creations of natural environments that included conversational speech embedded in recorded backgrounds and allowed a systematic manipulation of signal-to-noise ratio. The second aim of the study was to examine these same parameters in typical clinical speech-in-noise tests and consider the "acoustic realism" of such tests. We confirmed that the parameter spaces of natural environments are poorly covered by those of the most commonly used clinical test with one frontal loudspeaker. We also demonstrated that a simple variation of the clinical test, which uses two spatially separated loudspeakers to present speech and noise, leads to better coverage of the parameter spaces of natural environments. Overall, the results provide a framework for characterizing different listening environments that may guide future efforts to increase the real-world relevance of clinical speech-in-noise testing.

Trends in HearingVol. 29
Boston University (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.