Misconceptions on Food Date Labels and Consumer Welfare Implications

ABSTRACT When multiple food date label phrases are allowed, consumers may misinterpret these labels, causing inefficiency. Using data collected in China, we find considerable consumer misinterpretation even when only one type of food date label is permitted by regulation. Furthermore, consumer preference diverges according to their own interpretation of the label and depending on the type of food. Misinterpretation also leads to consumer welfare loss. Through a value of information (VOI) framework and when misinterpretation is taken into consideration, we show that changing a Sell by label to a Not use if after label generates the largest welfare gain. Our findings advise food manufacturers and policymakers on understanding consumer perspectives of food date labels and creating efficient labeling regulations given consumer misinterpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Economics
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70031
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misconceptions on Food Date Labels and Consumer Welfare Implications

Ping Qing, Wuyang Hu, Qi Jiang, Xiaolei Li et al.
4 citations
Agricultural Economics
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
7.51
article

Misconceptions on Food Date Labels and Consumer Welfare Implications

Ping Qing, Wuyang Hu, Qi Jiang, Xiaolei Li, Jian Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT When multiple food date label phrases are allowed, consumers may misinterpret these labels, causing inefficiency. Using data collected in China, we find considerable consumer misinterpretation even when only one type of food date label is permitted by regulation. Furthermore, consumer preference diverges according to their own interpretation of the label and depending on the type of food. Misinterpretation also leads to consumer welfare loss. Through a value of information (VOI) framework and when misinterpretation is taken into consideration, we show that changing a Sell by label to a Not use if after label generates the largest welfare gain. Our findings advise food manufacturers and policymakers on understanding consumer perspectives of food date labels and creating efficient labeling regulations given consumer misinterpretation.

Agricultural EconomicsVol. 56(5)
Huazhong Agricultural University (CN), The Ohio State University (US), Clemson University (US), Northwest A&F University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
7.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.