Bidirectional allocation method of provincial carbon emission allowances under China's 2030 carbon peak target: From equity and efficiency perspective

To address the shortcomings of existing research on provincial carbon emission allowance (CEA) allocation regarding connecting the current situation with future trends, balancing provincial development demands with responsibilities, as well as reconciling equity and efficiency, this study proposed a bidirectional CEA allocation method to guide China’s 2030 carbon peak goal. Drawing on province-specific characteristics and multiple guiding principles, we designed 961 allocation schemes. An integrated evaluation system combining equity (via the extended Gini coefficient) and efficiency (via the Malmquist index) yielded 18 Pareto-optimal solutions. These schemes achieve a trade-off between equity (Gini coefficient 0.29–0.33) and efficiency (Malmquist index 1.010–1.015). The optimal schemes account for provincial heterogeneity: advanced regions such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong would reduce emissions below their 2020 levels under ten of the eighteen schemes, whereas regions such as Tianjin, Shanxi, and Shaanxi would still have room for emission growth across all schemes. By offering a suite of trade-off solutions, our approach equips policymakers with the flexibility to prioritize equity or efficiency according to regional needs. Additionally, tailored policy recommendations are outlined for advancing carbon dual-control mechanisms and crafting support measures reflecting provincial characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Climate Change Research
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2025.04.018
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bidirectional allocation method of provincial carbon emission allowances under China's 2030 carbon peak target: From equity and efficiency perspective

Xiaofeng Li, Xiu Yang, Fan Yang
2 citations
Advances in Climate Change Research
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.60
article

Bidirectional allocation method of provincial carbon emission allowances under China's 2030 carbon peak target: From equity and efficiency perspective

Xiaofeng Li, Xiu Yang, Fan Yang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To address the shortcomings of existing research on provincial carbon emission allowance (CEA) allocation regarding connecting the current situation with future trends, balancing provincial development demands with responsibilities, as well as reconciling equity and efficiency, this study proposed a bidirectional CEA allocation method to guide China’s 2030 carbon peak goal. Drawing on province-specific characteristics and multiple guiding principles, we designed 961 allocation schemes. An integrated evaluation system combining equity (via the extended Gini coefficient) and efficiency (via the Malmquist index) yielded 18 Pareto-optimal solutions. These schemes achieve a trade-off between equity (Gini coefficient 0.29–0.33) and efficiency (Malmquist index 1.010–1.015). The optimal schemes account for provincial heterogeneity: advanced regions such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong would reduce emissions below their 2020 levels under ten of the eighteen schemes, whereas regions such as Tianjin, Shanxi, and Shaanxi would still have room for emission growth across all schemes. By offering a suite of trade-off solutions, our approach equips policymakers with the flexibility to prioritize equity or efficiency according to regional needs. Additionally, tailored policy recommendations are outlined for advancing carbon dual-control mechanisms and crafting support measures reflecting provincial characteristics.

Advances in Climate Change ResearchVol. 16(4)
Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.