Exploring image and skeleton-based action recognition approaches for clinical in-bed classification of simulated epileptic seizure movements

• Novel study to classify simulated Movements of Interest (MOIs) by action recognition. • Acquired a novel 7-class simulated seizure MOI dataset acted by 8 epileptologists. • Image-based vs. skeleton-based action recognition are compared for MOI classification. • Highlights benefits of skeleton-based action recognition with transfer learning. • Future work should integrate skeleton-based methods with hand gesture recognition. Epileptic seizure classification based on seizure semiology requires automated, quantitative approaches to support the diagnosis of epilepsy, which affects 1% of the world’s population. Current approaches address the problem on a seizure level, neglecting the detailed evaluation of the classification of the underlying action features, also known as Movements of Interest (MOIs), which are critical for epileptologists in determining their classifications. Moreover, it hinders objective comparison of these approaches and attribution of performance differences due to datasets, intra-dataset MOI distribution, or architecture variations. Objective evaluation of action recognition techniques is crucial, with MOIs serving as foundational elements of semiology for clinical in-bed applications to facilitate epileptic seizure classification. However, until now, there were no MOI datasets available nor benchmarks comparing different action recognition approaches for this clinical problem. Therefore, as a pilot, we introduced a novel, simulated seizure semiology dataset carried out by 8 experienced epileptologists in an EMU bed, consisting of 7 MOI classes. We compare several computer vision methods for MOI classification, two image-based (I3D and Uniformerv2), and two skeleton-based (ST-GCN++ and PoseC3D) action recognition approaches. This study emphasizes the advantages of a 2-stage skeleton-based action recognition approach in a transfer learning setting (4 classes) and the multi-scale challenge of MOI classification (7 classes), advocating for the integration of skeleton-based methods with hand gesture recognition technologies in the future. The study’s controlled MOI simulation dataset provides us with the opportunity to advance the development of automated epileptic seizure classification systems, paving the way for enhancing their performance and having the potential to contribute to improved patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems with Applications
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128043
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring image and skeleton-based action recognition approaches for clinical in-bed classification of simulated epileptic seizure movements

Fernando De La Torre, João Paulo Silva Cunha, Denise Birk, Jan Rémi et al.
2 citations
Expert Systems with Applications
Epilepsy research and treatment
2.94
article

Exploring image and skeleton-based action recognition approaches for clinical in-bed classification of simulated epileptic seizure movements

Fernando De La Torre, João Paulo Silva Cunha, Denise Birk, Jan Rémi, Nicholas Fearns, László A. Jeni, Katharina Ernst, Christian Vollmar, Tamás Karácsony, Selina Denise Trapp
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Novel study to classify simulated Movements of Interest (MOIs) by action recognition. • Acquired a novel 7-class simulated seizure MOI dataset acted by 8 epileptologists. • Image-based vs. skeleton-based action recognition are compared for MOI classification. • Highlights benefits of skeleton-based action recognition with transfer learning. • Future work should integrate skeleton-based methods with hand gesture recognition. Epileptic seizure classification based on seizure semiology requires automated, quantitative approaches to support the diagnosis of epilepsy, which affects 1% of the world’s population. Current approaches address the problem on a seizure level, neglecting the detailed evaluation of the classification of the underlying action features, also known as Movements of Interest (MOIs), which are critical for epileptologists in determining their classifications. Moreover, it hinders objective comparison of these approaches and attribution of performance differences due to datasets, intra-dataset MOI distribution, or architecture variations. Objective evaluation of action recognition techniques is crucial, with MOIs serving as foundational elements of semiology for clinical in-bed applications to facilitate epileptic seizure classification. However, until now, there were no MOI datasets available nor benchmarks comparing different action recognition approaches for this clinical problem. Therefore, as a pilot, we introduced a novel, simulated seizure semiology dataset carried out by 8 experienced epileptologists in an EMU bed, consisting of 7 MOI classes. We compare several computer vision methods for MOI classification, two image-based (I3D and Uniformerv2), and two skeleton-based (ST-GCN++ and PoseC3D) action recognition approaches. This study emphasizes the advantages of a 2-stage skeleton-based action recognition approach in a transfer learning setting (4 classes) and the multi-scale challenge of MOI classification (7 classes), advocating for the integration of skeleton-based methods with hand gesture recognition technologies in the future. The study’s controlled MOI simulation dataset provides us with the opportunity to advance the development of automated epileptic seizure classification systems, paving the way for enhancing their performance and having the potential to contribute to improved patient care.

Expert Systems with ApplicationsVol. 286
Universidade do Porto (PT), INESC TEC (PT), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
China Medical University, Taiwan, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Epilepsy research and treatment
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.