Mapping Gendered Economic Abuse Across the Relationship Lifecourse: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography

Abstract Purpose In this paper, we provide a review of extant qualitative research that reports on women’s experience of economic abuse during intimate relationships and following separation. To advance understanding of the processes of economic abuse that play out over the course of an intimate relationship, we draw on Zelizer’s social meaning of money and Risman’s causal mechanisms of gender to provide a conceptual basis and typology to begin to untangle gender, finance, and violence in intimate-partner relationships. Methods This qualitative meta-ethnography draws on 19 studies that centre the lived experiences of women survivors of economic abuse. Following a multi-faceted literature searching strategy across leading academic databases, studies were coded and analyzed drawing on Zelizer and Risman to conduct a gendered analysis of economic abuse in intimate relationships. Results The studies identified seemingly innocuous, but ultimately controlling behaviors that served to establish the financial gender order within and beyond relationships. The evidence showed that it is fairly straightforward for economically abusive male partners to exploit the established financial gender order to their advantage to assert power within their intimate relationships. Patterns of abuse could often be difficult for women to identify given the cultural acceptance of men’s financial authority and autonomy. The included articles, however, highlighted points in abusive relationships where catalytic events ruptured the victim-survivor's perspective on their financial or physical safety. After leaving an abusive ex-partner, however, some women endured institutionalized economic abuse through government systems, such as child support and family law court proceedings, whereby fraudulent economic behavior continued to be enacted. Conclusions The research studies included in this review, and our synthesis of their findings, have brought women’s experiences to the fore in order to shed light on the often invisible experience of economic abuse. The processual framework of the financial gender order helps to identify points within intimate relationships where economic abuse escalates. An ongoing, yet concerted effort is required to identify and dismantle the individual, community and institutional sites at which unquestioned and archaic gendered financial assumptions are enacted and proliferate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-025-00872-7
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Gendered Economic Abuse Across the Relationship Lifecourse: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography

Kay Cook, Adrienne Byrt
Journal of Family Violence
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Mapping Gendered Economic Abuse Across the Relationship Lifecourse: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography

Kay Cook, Adrienne Byrt
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose In this paper, we provide a review of extant qualitative research that reports on women’s experience of economic abuse during intimate relationships and following separation. To advance understanding of the processes of economic abuse that play out over the course of an intimate relationship, we draw on Zelizer’s social meaning of money and Risman’s causal mechanisms of gender to provide a conceptual basis and typology to begin to untangle gender, finance, and violence in intimate-partner relationships. Methods This qualitative meta-ethnography draws on 19 studies that centre the lived experiences of women survivors of economic abuse. Following a multi-faceted literature searching strategy across leading academic databases, studies were coded and analyzed drawing on Zelizer and Risman to conduct a gendered analysis of economic abuse in intimate relationships. Results The studies identified seemingly innocuous, but ultimately controlling behaviors that served to establish the financial gender order within and beyond relationships. The evidence showed that it is fairly straightforward for economically abusive male partners to exploit the established financial gender order to their advantage to assert power within their intimate relationships. Patterns of abuse could often be difficult for women to identify given the cultural acceptance of men’s financial authority and autonomy. The included articles, however, highlighted points in abusive relationships where catalytic events ruptured the victim-survivor's perspective on their financial or physical safety. After leaving an abusive ex-partner, however, some women endured institutionalized economic abuse through government systems, such as child support and family law court proceedings, whereby fraudulent economic behavior continued to be enacted. Conclusions The research studies included in this review, and our synthesis of their findings, have brought women’s experiences to the fore in order to shed light on the often invisible experience of economic abuse. The processual framework of the financial gender order helps to identify points within intimate relationships where economic abuse escalates. An ongoing, yet concerted effort is required to identify and dismantle the individual, community and institutional sites at which unquestioned and archaic gendered financial assumptions are enacted and proliferate.

Journal of Family Violence
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Family Process Institute, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.