The Kolumbo Volcanic Field, Greece: expert elicitation findings supporting volcanic hazard and risk assessment

Abstract A detailed hazard and risk assessment has been undertaken for the Kolumbo Volcanic Field (KVF), which includes the Kulumbo Central Volcano, an active volcano situated in the Aegean Sea, Greece. In support, a comprehensive structured expert judgment exercise was conducted using the Classical Model for pooling specialists’ uncertainty quantifications concerning Target Item questions concerning volcanological model parameters, empirical variables, and event probabilities of interest. In total, 64 Target Items, organized according to a new event tree model for the KVF, were elicited from 15 specialists who participated in two workshops. Related statistical distributions and associated uncertainties were quantified via ELICIPY, a recently released Python tool implementing the Classical Model algorithm. The overarching methodological approach is summarized, and a number of examples of ELICIPY solutions for specific Target Items are given, illustrating the nature and key probabilistic features of such results. The Target Items included questions aimed at reconstructing the 1650 CE eruption of Kolumbo central Volcano and providing statistical characterizations as direct inputs to various hazard and risk models for a potential near-future eruption in the KVF. In addition, a new type of elicitation metric, the ‘Conformity Score’, is introduced in two alternative formulations for ranking the item-wise extents of agreement/disagreement between experts providing judgments; these rankings help inform stake holders which specific Target Items are well-constrained by expert elicitation, while also identifying where possible major knowledge gaps among experts may exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Volcanology
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-025-01822-3
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Kolumbo Volcanic Field, Greece: expert elicitation findings supporting volcanic hazard and risk assessment

Mattia de’ Michieli Vitturi, Willy Aspinall, Augusto Neri, R. S. J. Sparks et al.
6 citations
Bulletin of Volcanology
Landslides and related hazards
14.53
article

The Kolumbo Volcanic Field, Greece: expert elicitation findings supporting volcanic hazard and risk assessment

Mattia de’ Michieli Vitturi, Willy Aspinall, Augusto Neri, R. S. J. Sparks, Alessandro Tadini, Andrea Bevilacqua
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract A detailed hazard and risk assessment has been undertaken for the Kolumbo Volcanic Field (KVF), which includes the Kulumbo Central Volcano, an active volcano situated in the Aegean Sea, Greece. In support, a comprehensive structured expert judgment exercise was conducted using the Classical Model for pooling specialists’ uncertainty quantifications concerning Target Item questions concerning volcanological model parameters, empirical variables, and event probabilities of interest. In total, 64 Target Items, organized according to a new event tree model for the KVF, were elicited from 15 specialists who participated in two workshops. Related statistical distributions and associated uncertainties were quantified via ELICIPY, a recently released Python tool implementing the Classical Model algorithm. The overarching methodological approach is summarized, and a number of examples of ELICIPY solutions for specific Target Items are given, illustrating the nature and key probabilistic features of such results. The Target Items included questions aimed at reconstructing the 1650 CE eruption of Kolumbo central Volcano and providing statistical characterizations as direct inputs to various hazard and risk models for a potential near-future eruption in the KVF. In addition, a new type of elicitation metric, the ‘Conformity Score’, is introduced in two alternative formulations for ranking the item-wise extents of agreement/disagreement between experts providing judgments; these rankings help inform stake holders which specific Target Items are well-constrained by expert elicitation, while also identifying where possible major knowledge gaps among experts may exist.

Bulletin of VolcanologyVol. 87(6)
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT), University of Bristol (GB), Spinal Research (GB)
University of Bristol, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Landslides and related hazards
14.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.