The Place of Spending Reviews Among Performance Analysis Tools

Since 2019 Russia has been using a new management tool for improving the efficiency of state expenditures — spending reviews (SR) prepared by the Ministry of Finance to identify opportunities for more economical spending of state budget resources. Although this tool is quite popular among OECD countries, the article highlights a problem common to both OECD countries and Russia: lack of a clear distinction between the goals and objectives of SRs and previously existing ways of analyzing the efficiency of budget expenditures, such as the performance audits performed by the supreme audit institutions created by parliament as well as executive branch analyses of the efficiency of projects and programs carried out as part of performance-oriented budgeting. The main purpose of the article is to situate spending reviews among the other tools for managing budget expenditures and to address other problems that can affect the usefulness of spending reviews. The article analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of various options for delineating the functions and tasks of reviews and of audit or performance analyses carried out by the Accounts Chamber and the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia. Ways to select targets for review and to determine the content of various types of review are then proposed. The article also recommends legislative changes needed to increase the integration of SRs into the overall budget process so that their findings may be taken into account when modifying state programs and making budgetary allocations for the coming year. The article concludes that the reviews should be openly published and provide mechanisms for verifying the implementation of the decisions taken based on their results.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Policy
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-2-82-105
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Place of Spending Reviews Among Performance Analysis Tools

Анна Золотарева, Ilya Sokolov
1 citations
Economic Policy
Accounting and Organizational Management
2.28
article

The Place of Spending Reviews Among Performance Analysis Tools

Анна Золотарева, Ilya Sokolov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since 2019 Russia has been using a new management tool for improving the efficiency of state expenditures — spending reviews (SR) prepared by the Ministry of Finance to identify opportunities for more economical spending of state budget resources. Although this tool is quite popular among OECD countries, the article highlights a problem common to both OECD countries and Russia: lack of a clear distinction between the goals and objectives of SRs and previously existing ways of analyzing the efficiency of budget expenditures, such as the performance audits performed by the supreme audit institutions created by parliament as well as executive branch analyses of the efficiency of projects and programs carried out as part of performance-oriented budgeting. The main purpose of the article is to situate spending reviews among the other tools for managing budget expenditures and to address other problems that can affect the usefulness of spending reviews. The article analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of various options for delineating the functions and tasks of reviews and of audit or performance analyses carried out by the Accounts Chamber and the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia. Ways to select targets for review and to determine the content of various types of review are then proposed. The article also recommends legislative changes needed to increase the integration of SRs into the overall budget process so that their findings may be taken into account when modifying state programs and making budgetary allocations for the coming year. The article concludes that the reviews should be openly published and provide mechanisms for verifying the implementation of the decisions taken based on their results.

Economic PolicyVol. 20(2)
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Accounting and Organizational Management
2.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.