Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring and Arterial Blood Gas Exchange During Spinal vs General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Mongolian Parturient

Objective: This study investigated the accuracy and precision of continuous, invasive blood pressure obtained using the arterial line system in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal and general anesthesia. Methods: A total of 150 parturient women who underwent C-sections from July 1, 2021, to Dec 30, 2023, were divided into two groups: the GA (general anesthesia) group (n=50) and the SA (spinal anesthesia) group (n=100). In this prospective observational study, we measured and compared the changes in hemodynamic fluctuation and arterial blood gas deviations under C-section with either spinal or general anesthesia. Results: One hundred fifty patients were recruited for the study after exclusions, and data were analyzed for 150 patients. There were no significant differences in the time from anesthesia to incision, the operation duration, infused crystalloid volume, blood loss, and urine output. The most frequent complications were surgery hypotension, tachycardia, nausea, and headache in the SA group, and tachycardia, hypertension, in the GA group These complications may cause SA’s impact on the sympathetic nerves, resulting in dilated blood vessels and reflex tachycardia. Conclusion: It has been suggested that the choice of anesthesia technique has a significant impact on hemodynamic stability during cesarean section.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Central Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24079/cajms.2024.04.001
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring and Arterial Blood Gas Exchange During Spinal vs General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Mongolian Parturient

Ganbold Lundeg, Munkhtsetseg Janlav, Mungun Banzar, Enkhtsetseg Jamsranjav
Central Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring and Arterial Blood Gas Exchange During Spinal vs General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Mongolian Parturient

Ganbold Lundeg, Munkhtsetseg Janlav, Mungun Banzar, Enkhtsetseg Jamsranjav
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the accuracy and precision of continuous, invasive blood pressure obtained using the arterial line system in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal and general anesthesia. Methods: A total of 150 parturient women who underwent C-sections from July 1, 2021, to Dec 30, 2023, were divided into two groups: the GA (general anesthesia) group (n=50) and the SA (spinal anesthesia) group (n=100). In this prospective observational study, we measured and compared the changes in hemodynamic fluctuation and arterial blood gas deviations under C-section with either spinal or general anesthesia. Results: One hundred fifty patients were recruited for the study after exclusions, and data were analyzed for 150 patients. There were no significant differences in the time from anesthesia to incision, the operation duration, infused crystalloid volume, blood loss, and urine output. The most frequent complications were surgery hypotension, tachycardia, nausea, and headache in the SA group, and tachycardia, hypertension, in the GA group These complications may cause SA’s impact on the sympathetic nerves, resulting in dilated blood vessels and reflex tachycardia. Conclusion: It has been suggested that the choice of anesthesia technique has a significant impact on hemodynamic stability during cesarean section.

Central Asian Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 10(4)
Mongolian National University (MN), Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences (MN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.