Patient CT-based simulation study of secondary-electron-bremsstrahlung imaging for range verification in proton therapy: comparison with prompt gamma and PET imaging for simplified proton pencil beam and SOBP irradiation scenarios

<i>Objective.</i>Secondary electron bremsstrahlung (SEB) imaging, along with prompt gamma (PG) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, has been proposed as an<i>in vivo</i>range verification tool for proton therapy. This study presents the first simulation based on patient computed tomography (CT) data to investigate the feasibility of SEB imaging for range verification in proton therapy, while comparing the characteristics of SEB imaging with those of PG and PET imaging.<i>Approach.</i>A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using patient CT data for the irradiation of monoenergetic pencil beams and spread-out Bragg peak proton beams. The physical characteristics of SEB imaging were analyzed at three different anatomical sites and compared with those of PG and PET imaging.<i>Main results</i>. In all the treatment cases, SEB imaging exhibited higher production rates than PG and PET imaging, particularly in the regions with high CT values along the beam path. Although the SEB signal was more affected by scattering and absorption than the PET or PG signals, sufficient statistical counts for range verification (∼3 × 10<sup>-3</sup>SEBs/proton) could potentially be detected outside the patient geometry. For pencil beam cases, the SEB and PET fall-offs were located 4-5 mm proximal to the dose fall-off, while the PG fall-off was located 0-1 mm distal to it.<i>Significance.</i>Results suggest that SEB imaging has the potential to offer a real-time range verification tool (by comparing measured and expected images), particularly for treating shallow-seated tumors using proton pencil-beam scanning delivery. Thus, this study represents a significant step towards the clinical application of range verification based on SEB imaging and promotes future efforts in this direction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/add4b7
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient CT-based simulation study of secondary-electron-bremsstrahlung imaging for range verification in proton therapy: comparison with prompt gamma and PET imaging for simplified proton pencil beam and SOBP irradiation scenarios

Katia Parodi, Naoki Kawachi, Takuya Yabe, Munetaka Nitta et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Patient CT-based simulation study of secondary-electron-bremsstrahlung imaging for range verification in proton therapy: comparison with prompt gamma and PET imaging for simplified proton pencil beam and SOBP irradiation scenarios

Katia Parodi, Naoki Kawachi, Takuya Yabe, Munetaka Nitta, Mitsutaka Yamaguchi, Marco Pinto
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Secondary electron bremsstrahlung (SEB) imaging, along with prompt gamma (PG) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, has been proposed as an<i>in vivo</i>range verification tool for proton therapy. This study presents the first simulation based on patient computed tomography (CT) data to investigate the feasibility of SEB imaging for range verification in proton therapy, while comparing the characteristics of SEB imaging with those of PG and PET imaging.<i>Approach.</i>A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using patient CT data for the irradiation of monoenergetic pencil beams and spread-out Bragg peak proton beams. The physical characteristics of SEB imaging were analyzed at three different anatomical sites and compared with those of PG and PET imaging.<i>Main results</i>. In all the treatment cases, SEB imaging exhibited higher production rates than PG and PET imaging, particularly in the regions with high CT values along the beam path. Although the SEB signal was more affected by scattering and absorption than the PET or PG signals, sufficient statistical counts for range verification (∼3 × 10<sup>-3</sup>SEBs/proton) could potentially be detected outside the patient geometry. For pencil beam cases, the SEB and PET fall-offs were located 4-5 mm proximal to the dose fall-off, while the PG fall-off was located 0-1 mm distal to it.<i>Significance.</i>Results suggest that SEB imaging has the potential to offer a real-time range verification tool (by comparing measured and expected images), particularly for treating shallow-seated tumors using proton pencil-beam scanning delivery. Thus, this study represents a significant step towards the clinical application of range verification based on SEB imaging and promotes future efforts in this direction.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(11)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP), National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (JP), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.