Human-Centered AI and the Future of Translation Technologies: What Professionals Think About Control and Autonomy in the AI Era

Two key pillars of human-centered AI (HCAI) approaches are “control” and “autonomy”. To date, little is known about professional translators’ attitudes towards these concepts in the AI era. This paper explores this issue through a survey study of US-based professional translators in mid-2024. Methodologically, this paper presents a qualitative analysis of open-ended questions through thematic coding to identify themes related to (1) present conceptualizations of control and autonomy over translation technologies, (2) future attitudes towards control and autonomy in the AI era, (3) main threats and challenges, and (4) recommendations to developers to enhance perceptions of control and autonomy. The results show that professionals perceive control and autonomy differently in both the present and the future. The main themes are usability, the ability to turn on and off technologies or reject jobs that require specific technologies, collaboration with developers, and differences in working with LSPs versus private clients. In terms of future attitudes, the most frequent ones are post-editing, quality, communicating or informing clients, LSPs or society at large, and creativity or rates. Overall, the study helps identify how professionals conceptualize control and autonomy and what specific issues could help foster the development of truly human-centered AI in the translation profession.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050387
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human-Centered AI and the Future of Translation Technologies: What Professionals Think About Control and Autonomy in the AI Era

Miguel A. Jiménez-Crespo
8 citations
Information
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
18.93
article

Human-Centered AI and the Future of Translation Technologies: What Professionals Think About Control and Autonomy in the AI Era

Miguel A. Jiménez-Crespo
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Two key pillars of human-centered AI (HCAI) approaches are “control” and “autonomy”. To date, little is known about professional translators’ attitudes towards these concepts in the AI era. This paper explores this issue through a survey study of US-based professional translators in mid-2024. Methodologically, this paper presents a qualitative analysis of open-ended questions through thematic coding to identify themes related to (1) present conceptualizations of control and autonomy over translation technologies, (2) future attitudes towards control and autonomy in the AI era, (3) main threats and challenges, and (4) recommendations to developers to enhance perceptions of control and autonomy. The results show that professionals perceive control and autonomy differently in both the present and the future. The main themes are usability, the ability to turn on and off technologies or reject jobs that require specific technologies, collaboration with developers, and differences in working with LSPs versus private clients. In terms of future attitudes, the most frequent ones are post-editing, quality, communicating or informing clients, LSPs or society at large, and creativity or rates. Overall, the study helps identify how professionals conceptualize control and autonomy and what specific issues could help foster the development of truly human-centered AI in the translation profession.

InformationVol. 16(5)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
18.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.