Anthropometric parameters as marker of sarcopenia

Introduction. The rare detection of sarcopenia (SP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with the low informative value of available screening methods and muscle strength assessing, and limited availability of instrumental body composition determination. Therefore, it is necessary to develop affordable screening methods for SP with good sensitivity and specificity. Aim. To establish the sensitivity and specificity of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and calf circumference (CC) measurements as methods for assessing muscle mass in comparison with data obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for detection of SP in women with RA. Materials and methods. 201 women (mean age 59.3 ± 9.0 years) with confirmed RA were examined by a standard clinical examination, as well as measurement of MUAC and CC. Body composition analysis using DXA was done. The sensitivity and specificity of anthropometric indicators for SP screening were determined using ROC-analysis. Results. The appendicular muscle index (AMI) was determined using DXA. AMI < 5.5 kg/m2 was detected in 37 (18.4%) patients. MUAC and CC had a direct correlation with AMI (r = 0.56 and r = 0.52, respectively, p < 0.001). MUAC ≤ 26.0 cm and CC ≤ 33.8 cm were determined, which had the optimal ratio of sensitivity and specificity for low muscle mass screening (67.6% and 84.2%, respectively, for MUAC; 73.0% and 76.2%, respectively, for CC). The area under the curve (AUC) for the MUAC was 0.822 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.762–0.873, p < 0.001), and for the CC – 0.789 (95% CI 0.762–0.844, p < 0.001). Simultaneous use of the both indicators had a sensitivity of 62.2% and a specificity of 90.2%. Conclusions. In patients with RA, MUAC or CC had comparable diagnostic significance and can be used for SP screening. Simultaneous use of two measurements did not improve the diagnostic value. Further evaluation of available screening methods is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-149
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropometric parameters as marker of sarcopenia

M. V. Kozyreva, Н. В. Торопцова, Н. В. Демин, O. V. Dobrovolskaya
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Anthropometric parameters as marker of sarcopenia

M. V. Kozyreva, Н. В. Торопцова, Н. В. Демин, O. V. Dobrovolskaya
article en

Abstract

Introduction. The rare detection of sarcopenia (SP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with the low informative value of available screening methods and muscle strength assessing, and limited availability of instrumental body composition determination. Therefore, it is necessary to develop affordable screening methods for SP with good sensitivity and specificity. Aim. To establish the sensitivity and specificity of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and calf circumference (CC) measurements as methods for assessing muscle mass in comparison with data obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for detection of SP in women with RA. Materials and methods. 201 women (mean age 59.3 ± 9.0 years) with confirmed RA were examined by a standard clinical examination, as well as measurement of MUAC and CC. Body composition analysis using DXA was done. The sensitivity and specificity of anthropometric indicators for SP screening were determined using ROC-analysis. Results. The appendicular muscle index (AMI) was determined using DXA. AMI < 5.5 kg/m2 was detected in 37 (18.4%) patients. MUAC and CC had a direct correlation with AMI (r = 0.56 and r = 0.52, respectively, p < 0.001). MUAC ≤ 26.0 cm and CC ≤ 33.8 cm were determined, which had the optimal ratio of sensitivity and specificity for low muscle mass screening (67.6% and 84.2%, respectively, for MUAC; 73.0% and 76.2%, respectively, for CC). The area under the curve (AUC) for the MUAC was 0.822 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.762–0.873, p < 0.001), and for the CC – 0.789 (95% CI 0.762–0.844, p < 0.001). Simultaneous use of the both indicators had a sensitivity of 62.2% and a specificity of 90.2%. Conclusions. In patients with RA, MUAC or CC had comparable diagnostic significance and can be used for SP screening. Simultaneous use of two measurements did not improve the diagnostic value. Further evaluation of available screening methods is needed.

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council(5)
Association of Rheumatologists of Russia (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.