The Impact of Orthodontic Adhesives on the Subgingival Microbiota During Early Fixed Appliance Therapy: A Pilot Study

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: The most common method for treating malocclusions today is fixed orthodontic therapy, during which brackets and tubes are bonded to the surface of the teeth, which makes oral hygiene difficult to maintain. Increased plaque retention, gingival bleeding, and gingivitis can be diagnosed in the early phases of treatment. The periodontal response to plaque accumulation can be explained by quantitative and qualitative changes in the subgingival microbiota. The aim of our research was to investigate the changes in the subgingival microbiota that occurred within 6-8 weeks after bonding when two different orthodontic adhesives were used. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Thirty patients were followed; molar tubes were bonded with a composite (C) in fifteen cases, and in the other fifteen cases, they were bonded with glass ionomer cementum (GIC). A microbiological sample was taken from the gingival sulcus of the maxillary first molars at the time of appliance placement (T1) and 6-8 weeks (T2) after bonding. Bacterial DNA detection was performed using the micro-IDent<sup>®</sup>plus11 (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Germany) PCR (polymerase chain reaction) method. The statistical analysis included McNemar's test to analyze the paired binary data and Fisher's Exact Test to compare the prevalence of each of the 11 bacteria at T1 and, ultimately, T2 between the two studied groups. The Bonferroni correction was also applied. <i>Results</i>: When analyzing GIC vs. C at T1 and T2, none of the studied pathogens showed significant differences. <i>Conclusions</i>: Given the lack of statistical significance, these trends do not confirm a definitive impact of the procedure on bacterial presence. The increased presence of periodontal pathogens might suggest that bonding does not reduce the bacterial loading of subgingival microbiota. Less protective effects of the GIC intervention against <i>Tannerella forsythia</i> and <i>Eubacterium nodatum</i> bacteria were detected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61050858
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Orthodontic Adhesives on the Subgingival Microbiota During Early Fixed Appliance Therapy: A Pilot Study

Izabella Éva Mureșan, Erika Kis, Andrei Constantin Ioanovici, Krisztina Mártha
Medicina
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

The Impact of Orthodontic Adhesives on the Subgingival Microbiota During Early Fixed Appliance Therapy: A Pilot Study

Izabella Éva Mureșan, Erika Kis, Andrei Constantin Ioanovici, Krisztina Mártha
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: The most common method for treating malocclusions today is fixed orthodontic therapy, during which brackets and tubes are bonded to the surface of the teeth, which makes oral hygiene difficult to maintain. Increased plaque retention, gingival bleeding, and gingivitis can be diagnosed in the early phases of treatment. The periodontal response to plaque accumulation can be explained by quantitative and qualitative changes in the subgingival microbiota. The aim of our research was to investigate the changes in the subgingival microbiota that occurred within 6-8 weeks after bonding when two different orthodontic adhesives were used. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Thirty patients were followed; molar tubes were bonded with a composite (C) in fifteen cases, and in the other fifteen cases, they were bonded with glass ionomer cementum (GIC). A microbiological sample was taken from the gingival sulcus of the maxillary first molars at the time of appliance placement (T1) and 6-8 weeks (T2) after bonding. Bacterial DNA detection was performed using the micro-IDent<sup>®</sup>plus11 (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Germany) PCR (polymerase chain reaction) method. The statistical analysis included McNemar's test to analyze the paired binary data and Fisher's Exact Test to compare the prevalence of each of the 11 bacteria at T1 and, ultimately, T2 between the two studied groups. The Bonferroni correction was also applied. <i>Results</i>: When analyzing GIC vs. C at T1 and T2, none of the studied pathogens showed significant differences. <i>Conclusions</i>: Given the lack of statistical significance, these trends do not confirm a definitive impact of the procedure on bacterial presence. The increased presence of periodontal pathogens might suggest that bonding does not reduce the bacterial loading of subgingival microbiota. Less protective effects of the GIC intervention against <i>Tannerella forsythia</i> and <i>Eubacterium nodatum</i> bacteria were detected.

MedicinaVol. 61(5)
Universitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș (RO)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.