Standardized Evaluation of Counter-Drone Systems: Methods, Technologies, and Performance Metrics

This paper aims to introduce a standardized test methodology for drone detection, tracking, and identification systems. It is the aim that this standardized test methodology for assessing the performance of counter-drone systems will lead to a much better understanding of the capabilities of these solutions. This is urgently needed, as there is an increase in drone threats and there are no cohesive policies to evaluate the performance of these systems and hence mitigate and manage the threat. The presented methodology has been developed within the framework of the project COURAGEOUS funded by European Union’s Internal Security Fund Police. This standardized test methodology is based upon a series of standard user-defined scenarios representing a wide set of use cases. At this moment, these standard scenarios are geared toward civil security end users. However, the proposed standard methodology provides an open architecture where the standard scenarios can be modularly extended, providing standard users the possibility to easily add new scenarios. For each of these scenarios, operational needs and functional performance requirements are provided. Using this information, an integral test methodology is presented that allows for a fair qualitative and quantitative comparison between different counter-drone systems. The standard test methodology concentrates on the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of counter-drone systems. This test methodology was validated during three user-scripted validation trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drones
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9050354
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Military Defense Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardized Evaluation of Counter-Drone Systems: Methods, Technologies, and Performance Metrics

Cristina Popa, Paraskevi Petsioti, Geert De Cubber, Daniela Doroftei et al.
4 citations
Drones
Military Defense Systems Analysis
19.97
article

Standardized Evaluation of Counter-Drone Systems: Methods, Technologies, and Performance Metrics

Cristina Popa, Paraskevi Petsioti, Geert De Cubber, Daniela Doroftei, Razvan Roman, Iván Maza, Anı́bal Ollero, Konrad Brewczyński, M. Życzkowski, Johan van de Pol, Ali Mohamoud, Christopher Church, Alexios Koniaris, Silviu Sima
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper aims to introduce a standardized test methodology for drone detection, tracking, and identification systems. It is the aim that this standardized test methodology for assessing the performance of counter-drone systems will lead to a much better understanding of the capabilities of these solutions. This is urgently needed, as there is an increase in drone threats and there are no cohesive policies to evaluate the performance of these systems and hence mitigate and manage the threat. The presented methodology has been developed within the framework of the project COURAGEOUS funded by European Union’s Internal Security Fund Police. This standardized test methodology is based upon a series of standard user-defined scenarios representing a wide set of use cases. At this moment, these standard scenarios are geared toward civil security end users. However, the proposed standard methodology provides an open architecture where the standard scenarios can be modularly extended, providing standard users the possibility to easily add new scenarios. For each of these scenarios, operational needs and functional performance requirements are provided. Using this information, an integral test methodology is presented that allows for a fair qualitative and quantitative comparison between different counter-drone systems. The standard test methodology concentrates on the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of counter-drone systems. This test methodology was validated during three user-scripted validation trials.

DronesVol. 9(5)
Royal Military Academy (BE), Medical Protective (US), Military University of Technology in Warsaw (PL), Dutch Research Council (NL), National Institute for Research and Development in Environmental Protection (RO), Association for Liberty and Equality of Gender (RO), Center for Security Studies (GR), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
European Commission, Internal Security Fund - Police
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Military Defense Systems Analysis
19.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.