Spatial Distribution, Source Identification, and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of the Yellow River Basin, China

Heavy metals (HMs), characterized by their non-biodegradable nature, are prone to enrichment in river sediments, thereby severely jeopardizing the equilibrium of ecosystems and human health. Given the critical importance of safeguarding valuable water resources, it is of utmost urgency to initiate research on HMs within the Yellow River Basin (YRB). This study collected river sediment samples from the Yellow River Basin and analyzed the distribution characteristics, health risks, and pollution sources of HMs utilizing the pollution index method, health risk assessment, and positive matrix factorization (PMF) model. The results demonstrate that arsenic (As), zinc (Zn), and cadmium (Cd) are the primary elements contributing to heavy metal (HM) pollution in the sediments of the YRB. The proportions of sediment samples with low HM pollution in the upstream, midstream, and downstream are 36.48%, 71.43%, and 72.73%, respectively, whereas the proportions of samples with moderate pollution are 63.16%, 28.57%, and 27.27%, respectively. The health risk assessment reveals that the non-carcinogenic risks posed by HM pollution in the sediments to adults are negligible, whereas those to children are not. Regarding carcinogenic risks, the carcinogenic risk index of As is significantly higher than that of the other HMs. The primary sources of HM pollution in the sediments are identified as traffic–industrial sources, agricultural–industrial sources, and industrial sources, with respective contribution rates of 32.47%, 44.87%, and 22.66%. As and Zn are prioritized as elements for health risk control, while agricultural–industrial sources are highlighted as the priority sources for pollution control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15095188
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Distribution, Source Identification, and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of the Yellow River Basin, China

Yuting Cheng, Xin Chen, Jing Li, Bin Wang et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Heavy metals in environment
0.50
article

Spatial Distribution, Source Identification, and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of the Yellow River Basin, China

Yuting Cheng, Xin Chen, Jing Li, Bin Wang, Guoce Xu, Wang Yun, Kang Ling Fang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Heavy metals (HMs), characterized by their non-biodegradable nature, are prone to enrichment in river sediments, thereby severely jeopardizing the equilibrium of ecosystems and human health. Given the critical importance of safeguarding valuable water resources, it is of utmost urgency to initiate research on HMs within the Yellow River Basin (YRB). This study collected river sediment samples from the Yellow River Basin and analyzed the distribution characteristics, health risks, and pollution sources of HMs utilizing the pollution index method, health risk assessment, and positive matrix factorization (PMF) model. The results demonstrate that arsenic (As), zinc (Zn), and cadmium (Cd) are the primary elements contributing to heavy metal (HM) pollution in the sediments of the YRB. The proportions of sediment samples with low HM pollution in the upstream, midstream, and downstream are 36.48%, 71.43%, and 72.73%, respectively, whereas the proportions of samples with moderate pollution are 63.16%, 28.57%, and 27.27%, respectively. The health risk assessment reveals that the non-carcinogenic risks posed by HM pollution in the sediments to adults are negligible, whereas those to children are not. Regarding carcinogenic risks, the carcinogenic risk index of As is significantly higher than that of the other HMs. The primary sources of HM pollution in the sediments are identified as traffic–industrial sources, agricultural–industrial sources, and industrial sources, with respective contribution rates of 32.47%, 44.87%, and 22.66%. As and Zn are prioritized as elements for health risk control, while agricultural–industrial sources are highlighted as the priority sources for pollution control.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(9)
Hebei Agricultural University (CN), Xi'an University of Science and Technology (CN), Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Education Department of Shaanxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Heavy metals in environment
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.