Facilitative and competitive effects of bracken fronds and litter on tree seedling recruitment

Introduction Tropical montane forests are diverse ecosystems increasingly threatened by land-use change and frequent uncontrolled fires caused by humans. After these fires, affected areas are often dominated by ferns of the genus Pteridium (bracken), delaying the rate of forest regeneration. This study examined the facilitative and competitive roles of bracken fronds and litter on seedling establishment, recruitment success, and growth after 36 months, and the extent to which these effects depend on seed size in early plant development processes. Methods At eight sites, we conducted seed addition and seedling-transplant experiments in plots established in bracken-dominated areas, using the following treatments: (a) fronds and litter intact (F+L+); (b) fronds intact and litter removed (F+L−); (c) fronds removed and litter intact (F−L+); and (d) fronds and litter removed (F−L−). Results A total of 46,640 seeds from 24 tree species were sown and 1,070 nursery-raised seedlings transplanted. In treatments with fronds and litter, seedling establishment and recruitment success increased with seed size. In contrast, in the treatment without fronds and litter all the species had low performance. Fronds proved to be highly beneficial for all seed sizes and for all early development processes. Litter, on the other hand, had negative effects on small-seeded species during establishment, but had neutral to positive effects on the recruitment and growth of all species. Discussion The disadvantage of small seeds under bracken litter may be related to the high light requirements of seedlings, as litter accumulation reduces light transmission. Species with large seeds and shade tolerance benefit from bracken frond cover, suggesting that restoration strategies in bracken-dominated areas should prioritize these species. Moreover, planting seeds or seedlings shortly after fire, in the presence of bracken fronds and before litter accumulation would be most beneficial for tree species. Additionally, seed dispersers play a crucial role in transporting large seeds into bracken-dominated areas, emphasizing the need for an integrated approach that considers biotic and abiotic factors for effective forest recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2025.1534920
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilitative and competitive effects of bracken fronds and litter on tree seedling recruitment

Isabell Hensen, Cecilia L. López, Silvia C. Gallegos, César Mayta et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
12.86
article

Facilitative and competitive effects of bracken fronds and litter on tree seedling recruitment

Isabell Hensen, Cecilia L. López, Silvia C. Gallegos, César Mayta, Andrea Soliz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction Tropical montane forests are diverse ecosystems increasingly threatened by land-use change and frequent uncontrolled fires caused by humans. After these fires, affected areas are often dominated by ferns of the genus Pteridium (bracken), delaying the rate of forest regeneration. This study examined the facilitative and competitive roles of bracken fronds and litter on seedling establishment, recruitment success, and growth after 36 months, and the extent to which these effects depend on seed size in early plant development processes. Methods At eight sites, we conducted seed addition and seedling-transplant experiments in plots established in bracken-dominated areas, using the following treatments: (a) fronds and litter intact (F+L+); (b) fronds intact and litter removed (F+L−); (c) fronds removed and litter intact (F−L+); and (d) fronds and litter removed (F−L−). Results A total of 46,640 seeds from 24 tree species were sown and 1,070 nursery-raised seedlings transplanted. In treatments with fronds and litter, seedling establishment and recruitment success increased with seed size. In contrast, in the treatment without fronds and litter all the species had low performance. Fronds proved to be highly beneficial for all seed sizes and for all early development processes. Litter, on the other hand, had negative effects on small-seeded species during establishment, but had neutral to positive effects on the recruitment and growth of all species. Discussion The disadvantage of small seeds under bracken litter may be related to the high light requirements of seedlings, as litter accumulation reduces light transmission. Species with large seeds and shade tolerance benefit from bracken frond cover, suggesting that restoration strategies in bracken-dominated areas should prioritize these species. Moreover, planting seeds or seedlings shortly after fire, in the presence of bracken fronds and before litter accumulation would be most beneficial for tree species. Additionally, seed dispersers play a crucial role in transporting large seeds into bracken-dominated areas, emphasizing the need for an integrated approach that considers biotic and abiotic factors for effective forest recovery.

Frontiers in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 13
Universidad Mayor de San Andrés (BO), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
12.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.