Telemedicine Regulation in Indonesia: Legal Frameworks, Challenges, and Future Directions

The rapid advancement of digital technology has positioned telemedicine as a transformative solution to address healthcare disparities, particularly in geographically fragmented regions like Indonesia. Despite its potential, telemedicine adoption in Indonesia faces significant challenges, including regulatory ambiguities, inadequate infrastructure, and concerns over data security and professional accountability. While recent legal frameworks, such as Law No. 17 of 2023 and Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, aim to address these issues, their implementation remains inconsistent, risking patient safety and trust. This study fills critical gaps in existing literature by integrating the rule of law and health justice frameworks to evaluate Indonesia’s telemedicine regulations—a novel approach absent in prior works. The study addresses two key research questions: (1) How does Indonesia’s current legal framework regulate telemedicine, and what gaps exist in practice? (2) How can telemedicine regulations align with the principles of a legal state (Rechtsstaat) to ensure accountability and equity? Employing a normative juridical methodology, the research combines legislative analysis, conceptual evaluation, and case studies, including the Dr. Damar case (2021), to assess regulatory coherence. Findings reveal significant gaps, including unclear liability standards for misdiagnoses, weak enforcement of data privacy laws, and disparities in rural telemedicine access. The study highlights misalignments with international standards like the GDPR and HIPAA, particularly in AI governance and cross-border data flows. To address these issues, the study recommends: (1) strengthening operational standards by adopting WHO guidelines and mandating AI validation; (2) clarifying liability frameworks to define malpractice accountability; and (3) bridging the digital divide through subsidized internet and device programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58344/jmi.v4i4.2267
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Telemedicine Regulation in Indonesia: Legal Frameworks, Challenges, and Future Directions

Fifi Mutiah, Hotma Sibuea, Mardi Chandra
2 citations
Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
3.76
article

Telemedicine Regulation in Indonesia: Legal Frameworks, Challenges, and Future Directions

Fifi Mutiah, Hotma Sibuea, Mardi Chandra
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has positioned telemedicine as a transformative solution to address healthcare disparities, particularly in geographically fragmented regions like Indonesia. Despite its potential, telemedicine adoption in Indonesia faces significant challenges, including regulatory ambiguities, inadequate infrastructure, and concerns over data security and professional accountability. While recent legal frameworks, such as Law No. 17 of 2023 and Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, aim to address these issues, their implementation remains inconsistent, risking patient safety and trust. This study fills critical gaps in existing literature by integrating the rule of law and health justice frameworks to evaluate Indonesia’s telemedicine regulations—a novel approach absent in prior works. The study addresses two key research questions: (1) How does Indonesia’s current legal framework regulate telemedicine, and what gaps exist in practice? (2) How can telemedicine regulations align with the principles of a legal state (Rechtsstaat) to ensure accountability and equity? Employing a normative juridical methodology, the research combines legislative analysis, conceptual evaluation, and case studies, including the Dr. Damar case (2021), to assess regulatory coherence. Findings reveal significant gaps, including unclear liability standards for misdiagnoses, weak enforcement of data privacy laws, and disparities in rural telemedicine access. The study highlights misalignments with international standards like the GDPR and HIPAA, particularly in AI governance and cross-border data flows. To address these issues, the study recommends: (1) strengthening operational standards by adopting WHO guidelines and mandating AI validation; (2) clarifying liability frameworks to define malpractice accountability; and (3) bridging the digital divide through subsidized internet and device programs.

Jurnal Multidisiplin IndonesiaVol. 4(4)
Universitas Jayabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Telemedicine Regulation in Indonesia: Legal Frameworks, Challenges, and Future Directions — Fifi Mutiah, Hotma Sibuea, et al. · Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS