Cognitive Assessment of Dementia in Incarcerated Populations: The Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination 3rd Edition and the Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination

There are many reasons why people experiencing incarceration may be predisposed to developing dementia. Dementia assessment in prisons is challenging. This study assessed the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination 3rd Edition (ACE-III) and the Mini Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) as potential tools for use in incarcerated populations, with a view to detecting suspected dementia. The ACE-III was administered to 114 males more than 50 years of age without a diagnosis of dementia across three prison sites in Victoria, Australia, in 2022. A psychogeriatrician reviewed data for atypical response patterns to determine whether individuals' profiles were suggestive of dementia. The M-ACE was scored retrospectively from the ACE-III. Scores were compared with the psychogeriatrician's review to determine concordance rates. Both tools acceptably discriminated males who indicated dementia from those without (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.77, [0.65, 0.98]; AUC = 0.77, [0.60, 0.93], respectively). Both tools produced high negative predictive values (0.96 and 0.97). Both the ACE-III and M-ACE demonstrated utility for use in this cohort. The M-ACE may be an useful tool for screening out individuals who do not have dementia, while the ACE-III provides a comprehensive cognitive profile as a basis to assess for dementia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Correctional Health Care
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jchc.24.08.0066
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Assessment of Dementia in Incarcerated Populations: The Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination 3rd Edition and the Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination

Stephen Macfarlane, Rachael Fullam, Margaret Nixon, Michael D. Trood et al.
1 citations
Journal of Correctional Health Care
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.47
article

Cognitive Assessment of Dementia in Incarcerated Populations: The Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination 3rd Edition and the Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination

Stephen Macfarlane, Rachael Fullam, Margaret Nixon, Michael D. Trood, Ella L. Modini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There are many reasons why people experiencing incarceration may be predisposed to developing dementia. Dementia assessment in prisons is challenging. This study assessed the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination 3rd Edition (ACE-III) and the Mini Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) as potential tools for use in incarcerated populations, with a view to detecting suspected dementia. The ACE-III was administered to 114 males more than 50 years of age without a diagnosis of dementia across three prison sites in Victoria, Australia, in 2022. A psychogeriatrician reviewed data for atypical response patterns to determine whether individuals' profiles were suggestive of dementia. The M-ACE was scored retrospectively from the ACE-III. Scores were compared with the psychogeriatrician's review to determine concordance rates. Both tools acceptably discriminated males who indicated dementia from those without (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.77, [0.65, 0.98]; AUC = 0.77, [0.60, 0.93], respectively). Both tools produced high negative predictive values (0.96 and 0.97). Both the ACE-III and M-ACE demonstrated utility for use in this cohort. The M-ACE may be an useful tool for screening out individuals who do not have dementia, while the ACE-III provides a comprehensive cognitive profile as a basis to assess for dementia.

Journal of Correctional Health CareVol. 31(3)
Monash University (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.