Financial globalization and macroeconomic volatility in Sub-Saharan African countries: do economic and political institutions matter?

Purpose This study aims to investigate the effect of financial globalization and economic and political institutions on macroeconomic volatility in the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In addition, the study examines the absorptive capacity of economic and political institutions in the link between financial globalization and macroeconomic volatility. Design/methodology/approach This study extracted data from twenty-seven SSA countries between 1991 and 2021. The study applies cross-sectional dependency tests, second-generation unit root tests and Driscoll and Kraay (1998) panel spatial correlation consistent (PSCC) standard errors to drive out the study’s conclusion. Findings The result suggests that financial globalization significantly contributes to macroeconomic volatility in the direct model, whereas its indirect effect rests largely on the indicators of economic and political institutions. For economic and political institutions, bureaucratic quality, democratic accountability and government stability negatively influence macroeconomic volatility. However, the effect of corruption control and law and order is insignificant. The interactive term of financial globalization and institutions shows that financial globalization interacted with democratic accountability, government stability and law and order, negatively affect macroeconomic volatility. On the other hand, the interactive effect of financial globalization with bureaucratic quality is significantly positive, whereas the interactive impact of financial globalization with corruption control is not significant. The net effect reveals that bureaucratic quality, democratic accountability, government stability and law and order moderate the positive effect of financial globalization on macroeconomic volatility in the region. Practical implications This study recommends the need to strengthen the economic and political institutions and develop the financial sector to cushion the effect of financial globalization on macroeconomic volatility. Originality/value This study adds to the body of knowledge by unearthing the moderating effect of economic and political institutions in the linkages between financial globalization and macroeconomic volatility, especially in SSA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfep-12-2024-0386
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial globalization and macroeconomic volatility in Sub-Saharan African countries: do economic and political institutions matter?

Ezekiel Olamide Abanikanda, James Temitope Dada, Mosab I. Tabash, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al‐Faryan et al.
1 citations
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
2.21
article

Financial globalization and macroeconomic volatility in Sub-Saharan African countries: do economic and political institutions matter?

Ezekiel Olamide Abanikanda, James Temitope Dada, Mosab I. Tabash, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al‐Faryan, Samrat Ray
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the effect of financial globalization and economic and political institutions on macroeconomic volatility in the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In addition, the study examines the absorptive capacity of economic and political institutions in the link between financial globalization and macroeconomic volatility. Design/methodology/approach This study extracted data from twenty-seven SSA countries between 1991 and 2021. The study applies cross-sectional dependency tests, second-generation unit root tests and Driscoll and Kraay (1998) panel spatial correlation consistent (PSCC) standard errors to drive out the study’s conclusion. Findings The result suggests that financial globalization significantly contributes to macroeconomic volatility in the direct model, whereas its indirect effect rests largely on the indicators of economic and political institutions. For economic and political institutions, bureaucratic quality, democratic accountability and government stability negatively influence macroeconomic volatility. However, the effect of corruption control and law and order is insignificant. The interactive term of financial globalization and institutions shows that financial globalization interacted with democratic accountability, government stability and law and order, negatively affect macroeconomic volatility. On the other hand, the interactive effect of financial globalization with bureaucratic quality is significantly positive, whereas the interactive impact of financial globalization with corruption control is not significant. The net effect reveals that bureaucratic quality, democratic accountability, government stability and law and order moderate the positive effect of financial globalization on macroeconomic volatility in the region. Practical implications This study recommends the need to strengthen the economic and political institutions and develop the financial sector to cushion the effect of financial globalization on macroeconomic volatility. Originality/value This study adds to the body of knowledge by unearthing the moderating effect of economic and political institutions in the linkages between financial globalization and macroeconomic volatility, especially in SSA.

Journal of Financial Economic PolicyVol. 18(1)
Al Ain University (AE), International Institute of Information Technology (IN), Saudi Heart Association (SA), Institute for Social and Economic Research (GB), Obafemi Awolowo University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.