Comparing ChatGPT‐4 and a Paediatric Intensive Care Specialist in Responding to Medical Education Questions: A Multicenter Evaluation
ChatGPT-4 shows promise as a tool for factual medical education in the PICU, excelling in completeness. However, it requires oversight in clinical reasoning tasks, where the PICU specialist's responses remain superior. Expert review is essential before using ChatGPT-4 independently in PICU education and in other similarly underexplored medical fields.
Authors
- Shai Yitzhaki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1034-7132)
- Yulia Gendler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9958-7777)
- Eytan Kaplan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-2294)
- Nir Peled (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3714-4377)
- Elhanan Nahum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6122-7570)
- Gili Kadmon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3917-4353)
- Avichai Weissbach (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1754-9396)
Institutions
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Schneider Children's Medical Center (IL)
- Ariel University (IL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
- Published
- 2025-05-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.70080
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.31