Enhancing a quality culture in higher education: navigating paradoxes

Purpose This paper aims to gain insight into enhancing and impeding elements for quality culture in higher education at programme level, emphasising the importance of an integral perspective considering both the structural/managerial and cultural/psychological aspects. Design/methodology/approach A single, in-depth case study was conducted based on sociotechnical systems design (STSD), a systems theory, to examine quality culture from an integral perspective in a bachelor’s programme of a Dutch university of applied sciences. The research encompasses semi-structured interviews with lecturers, team members and programme leaders (n = 9) and a brief questionnaire. Findings The outcomes of this case study show that enhancing a quality culture involves navigating paradoxes. Firstly, to enhance a quality culture, individual ownership needs to be shifted towards collective ownership. Secondly, the case underscores the necessity of incorporating both the social (competences and behaviour) and technical (information, feedback and responsibilities) systems, which need to be designed integrally by a participative process. Lastly, a strategic equilibrium between top-down and bottom-up approaches is essential for fostering team development and realising the crucial conditions for supporting a quality culture. Originality/value There are not many qualitative studies on quality culture. This study broadens authors’ empirical insights. Additionally, it demonstrates that systems theory is useful to investigate complex phenomena such as quality culture, due to its integral perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality Assurance in Education
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-09-2024-0195
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing a quality culture in higher education: navigating paradoxes

Lydia Schaap, Helma Oolbekkink-Marchand, Myrte Legemaate
1 citations
Quality Assurance in Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
8.52
article

Enhancing a quality culture in higher education: navigating paradoxes

Lydia Schaap, Helma Oolbekkink-Marchand, Myrte Legemaate
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to gain insight into enhancing and impeding elements for quality culture in higher education at programme level, emphasising the importance of an integral perspective considering both the structural/managerial and cultural/psychological aspects. Design/methodology/approach A single, in-depth case study was conducted based on sociotechnical systems design (STSD), a systems theory, to examine quality culture from an integral perspective in a bachelor’s programme of a Dutch university of applied sciences. The research encompasses semi-structured interviews with lecturers, team members and programme leaders (n = 9) and a brief questionnaire. Findings The outcomes of this case study show that enhancing a quality culture involves navigating paradoxes. Firstly, to enhance a quality culture, individual ownership needs to be shifted towards collective ownership. Secondly, the case underscores the necessity of incorporating both the social (competences and behaviour) and technical (information, feedback and responsibilities) systems, which need to be designed integrally by a participative process. Lastly, a strategic equilibrium between top-down and bottom-up approaches is essential for fostering team development and realising the crucial conditions for supporting a quality culture. Originality/value There are not many qualitative studies on quality culture. This study broadens authors’ empirical insights. Additionally, it demonstrates that systems theory is useful to investigate complex phenomena such as quality culture, due to its integral perspective.

Quality Assurance in EducationVol. 33(4)
HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Ghent University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Higher Education Governance and Development
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing a quality culture in higher education: navigating paradoxes — Lydia Schaap, Helma Oolbekkink-Marchand, et al. · Quality Assurance in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS