An investigation into computational modelling of phase change materials using the enthalpy-porosity approach

Purpose This study aims to examine the use of the enthalpy–porosity approach for simulating melting and solidification of paraffin-based phase change materials in the context of thermal energy storage. Design/methodology/approach This study describes a calibration exercise on a truncated cylindrical geometry that systematically investigates the sensitivity of the computational model to the mushy zone coefficient, the solidus/liquidus temperature separation and the convective intensity coefficient ci, which is introduced to account for the aggregate effect of remaining influences that are not individually modeled. Findings It was found that increases in the mushy zone coefficient and decreases in ci result in reduced intensity of convection. Moreover, it was observed that achieving a calibrated model requires consideration of all parameters collectively, rather than separately. The calibrated model was validated against experimental data for other heating conditions in the cylindrical cavity and in the prediction of melting in a rectangular cavity. The model is shown commute poorly across other heating conditions in terms of overall melting time but perform very well in other geometries subjected to the same heating conditions. When applied to solidification, significant discrepancies arise in terms of overall solidification time and in the temporal evolution of the interface separating the solid and liquid regions of the domain. Research limitations/implications When applied to solidification, significant discrepancies arise in terms of overall solidification time and in the temporal evolution of the interface separating the solid and liquid regions of the domain. It is thought that supercooling, differences in the solid–liquid interface and property dependencies on temperature may need to be considered for improved freezing process modeling. Practical implications This suggests that a calibrated model is well-suited for the development of heat transfer elements in applications like thermal storage where shape-optimization is paramount. Originality/value This suggests that a calibrated model is well-suited for the development of heat transfer elements in applications like thermal storage where shape-optimization is paramount. It is thought that supercooling, differences in the solid–liquid interface and property dependencies on temperature may need to be considered for improved solidification modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat &amp Fluid Flow
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/hff-11-2024-0817
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Phase Change Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An investigation into computational modelling of phase change materials using the enthalpy-porosity approach

Anthony G. Straatman, Kyle Teather, Kamran Siddiqui, Maryam Hemmat
2 citations
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat &amp Fluid Flow
Phase Change Materials Research
1.43
article

An investigation into computational modelling of phase change materials using the enthalpy-porosity approach

Anthony G. Straatman, Kyle Teather, Kamran Siddiqui, Maryam Hemmat
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the use of the enthalpy–porosity approach for simulating melting and solidification of paraffin-based phase change materials in the context of thermal energy storage. Design/methodology/approach This study describes a calibration exercise on a truncated cylindrical geometry that systematically investigates the sensitivity of the computational model to the mushy zone coefficient, the solidus/liquidus temperature separation and the convective intensity coefficient ci, which is introduced to account for the aggregate effect of remaining influences that are not individually modeled. Findings It was found that increases in the mushy zone coefficient and decreases in ci result in reduced intensity of convection. Moreover, it was observed that achieving a calibrated model requires consideration of all parameters collectively, rather than separately. The calibrated model was validated against experimental data for other heating conditions in the cylindrical cavity and in the prediction of melting in a rectangular cavity. The model is shown commute poorly across other heating conditions in terms of overall melting time but perform very well in other geometries subjected to the same heating conditions. When applied to solidification, significant discrepancies arise in terms of overall solidification time and in the temporal evolution of the interface separating the solid and liquid regions of the domain. Research limitations/implications When applied to solidification, significant discrepancies arise in terms of overall solidification time and in the temporal evolution of the interface separating the solid and liquid regions of the domain. It is thought that supercooling, differences in the solid–liquid interface and property dependencies on temperature may need to be considered for improved freezing process modeling. Practical implications This suggests that a calibrated model is well-suited for the development of heat transfer elements in applications like thermal storage where shape-optimization is paramount. Originality/value This suggests that a calibrated model is well-suited for the development of heat transfer elements in applications like thermal storage where shape-optimization is paramount. It is thought that supercooling, differences in the solid–liquid interface and property dependencies on temperature may need to be considered for improved solidification modeling.

International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat &amp Fluid FlowVol. 35(5)
Western University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Phase Change Materials Research
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.