A Return to Niels Bohr’s “Light and Life” (1932)

Abstract In August of 1932, quantum physicist Niels Bohr (1885–1962) delivered to the Second International Congress on Light Therapy meeting in Copenhagen his most extended treatment to that date concerning his reflections on the relevance of the new quantum mechanics for biological questions. Developing this against the backdrop of the “mechanism–vitalism” debate, he sketched out how he envisioned the relations of the new physics with classical issues of function, purpose, and teleology in biology. His address, republished here in its earliest English version, was also given in the context of his ongoing discussions of the relations of physics and biology with the German theoretical quantum physicist Ernst Pascual Jordan (1902–1980). Jordan’s subsequent interpretation of Bohr’s arguments resulted in considerable controversy and a long-term misunderstanding of Bohr’s main points. This contribution gives a detailed summary of this historical discussion and the controversies that surrounded Bohr’s arguments. It also examines Bohr’s final statements on the relations of physics and biology in the period before his death in November of 1962. A closing discussion considers the relevance of Bohr’s insights for contemporary discussions of biological reductionism and the place of the human knower in the scientific process. This is followed by the transcription of the rare 1932 text.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Theory
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-025-00490-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Return to Niels Bohr’s “Light and Life” (1932)

Phillip R. Sloan
1 citations
Biological Theory
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
1.25
article

A Return to Niels Bohr’s “Light and Life” (1932)

Phillip R. Sloan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In August of 1932, quantum physicist Niels Bohr (1885–1962) delivered to the Second International Congress on Light Therapy meeting in Copenhagen his most extended treatment to that date concerning his reflections on the relevance of the new quantum mechanics for biological questions. Developing this against the backdrop of the “mechanism–vitalism” debate, he sketched out how he envisioned the relations of the new physics with classical issues of function, purpose, and teleology in biology. His address, republished here in its earliest English version, was also given in the context of his ongoing discussions of the relations of physics and biology with the German theoretical quantum physicist Ernst Pascual Jordan (1902–1980). Jordan’s subsequent interpretation of Bohr’s arguments resulted in considerable controversy and a long-term misunderstanding of Bohr’s main points. This contribution gives a detailed summary of this historical discussion and the controversies that surrounded Bohr’s arguments. It also examines Bohr’s final statements on the relations of physics and biology in the period before his death in November of 1962. A closing discussion considers the relevance of Bohr’s insights for contemporary discussions of biological reductionism and the place of the human knower in the scientific process. This is followed by the transcription of the rare 1932 text.

Biological TheoryVol. 20(3)
University of Notre Dame (US)
National Science Foundation, Boston College, University of Notre Dame, Gentofte Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.