Understanding Design Rationale and Intent through Natural Language Processing analysis: A search for Consensus

Design and construction projects have become increasingly complex throughout recent decades, resulting in a heightened focus on knowledge management. Two specific knowledge types, which have received consideration in the literature are design intent and design rationale, as means for describing what is designed and why a design is the way it is. However, a definition of what design rationale and design intent are and what they consist of, in context of the AEC industry, has not been fully explored. In this study, a literature review, was conducted to summarise the definitions of design rationale and intent presented in the existing body of scientific literature across scientific disciplines. Both qualitative evaluation of the identified literature and Natural Language Processing (NLP) was utilised, identifying the distinctions between design rationale and design intent, and their hidden specificities. The study revealed that a design project must have both explicit design rationale and intent available to be successful, which can guide a designer or project manager in the direction of unexplored design alternatives if something in the design must be changed, instead of exploring already tested and discarded solutions. The study, furthermore, showed that having DR and DI available can support decision makers during design, pre-planning, and construction to ensure that their design solution lives up to the intent of the designer or building owner, through specifying the explicit justification for the solution, and not just what the solution is, should be, or consist of.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Technology in Construction
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2025.026
Citations
2
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Design Rationale and Intent through Natural Language Processing analysis: A search for Consensus

Simon Wyke, Søren Munch Lindhard
2 citations
Journal of Information Technology in Construction
BIM and Construction Integration
2.01
article

Understanding Design Rationale and Intent through Natural Language Processing analysis: A search for Consensus

Simon Wyke, Søren Munch Lindhard
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Design and construction projects have become increasingly complex throughout recent decades, resulting in a heightened focus on knowledge management. Two specific knowledge types, which have received consideration in the literature are design intent and design rationale, as means for describing what is designed and why a design is the way it is. However, a definition of what design rationale and design intent are and what they consist of, in context of the AEC industry, has not been fully explored. In this study, a literature review, was conducted to summarise the definitions of design rationale and intent presented in the existing body of scientific literature across scientific disciplines. Both qualitative evaluation of the identified literature and Natural Language Processing (NLP) was utilised, identifying the distinctions between design rationale and design intent, and their hidden specificities. The study revealed that a design project must have both explicit design rationale and intent available to be successful, which can guide a designer or project manager in the direction of unexplored design alternatives if something in the design must be changed, instead of exploring already tested and discarded solutions. The study, furthermore, showed that having DR and DI available can support decision makers during design, pre-planning, and construction to ensure that their design solution lives up to the intent of the designer or building owner, through specifying the explicit justification for the solution, and not just what the solution is, should be, or consist of.

Journal of Information Technology in ConstructionVol. 30
Aalborg University (DK)
Aalborg Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
BIM and Construction Integration
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.