Detecção de textos gerados pelo ChatGPT

The popularization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for text generation has intensified debates about the authenticity and reliability of digital content amid growing concerns about academic fraud, copyright violations, and misinformation. This study evaluated the effectiveness of five detection tools (Copyleaks AI Content Detector, AI by Smodin, PlagiarismDeTector.NET AI, ZeroGPT, and AI Content Detector) in distinguishing between human-written texts and texts generated by ChatGPT. The results indicate that the tools vary in their accuracy and reliability. While Copyleaks and AI by Smodin demonstrated high accuracy in identifying AI-generated and human-written texts, PlagiarismDeTector.NET AI showed several inconsistencies, especially in correctly distinguishing AI-generated texts. ZeroGPT and AI Content Detector showed variable performance, excelling in some scenarios and facing challenges in others. These findings highlight the ongoing need for improvement in AI text detection tools to ensure a secure and trustworthy digital environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Ciências do Estado
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35699/2525-8036.2024.53509
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecção de textos gerados pelo ChatGPT

Felipe Soares de Moraes
Revista de Ciências do Estado
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Detecção de textos gerados pelo ChatGPT

Felipe Soares de Moraes
article en

Abstract

The popularization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for text generation has intensified debates about the authenticity and reliability of digital content amid growing concerns about academic fraud, copyright violations, and misinformation. This study evaluated the effectiveness of five detection tools (Copyleaks AI Content Detector, AI by Smodin, PlagiarismDeTector.NET AI, ZeroGPT, and AI Content Detector) in distinguishing between human-written texts and texts generated by ChatGPT. The results indicate that the tools vary in their accuracy and reliability. While Copyleaks and AI by Smodin demonstrated high accuracy in identifying AI-generated and human-written texts, PlagiarismDeTector.NET AI showed several inconsistencies, especially in correctly distinguishing AI-generated texts. ZeroGPT and AI Content Detector showed variable performance, excelling in some scenarios and facing challenges in others. These findings highlight the ongoing need for improvement in AI text detection tools to ensure a secure and trustworthy digital environment.

Revista de Ciências do EstadoVol. 9(2)
Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.