Evaluation and Proposal of Strut-and-Tie Method for the Design of Drilled Shaft Footings

This paper presents a practical, accurate, and reasonably conservative procedure for the design and analysis of drilled shaft footings, also referred to as pile caps. A database of drilled shaft footing tests was compiled from the literature to evaluate the accuracy of an existing design guide based on the three-dimensional (3D) strut-and-tie method (STM). It was concluded that strength estimations obtained with the existing 3D STM-based design guidelines were excessively conservative, and the accuracy of the method varied with key design parameters such as strut inclination and drilled shaft size. Key enhancements to the 3D STM are proposed to resolve existing limitations and ambiguities, including the definition of tie area for bottom mat reinforcement, 3D nodal geometry, nodal strength, concrete efficiency factor, and tie anchorage checks. These recommendations are supported by experimental evidence, including data from large-scale footing tests recently conducted by the authors, and are consistent with current design code provisions. The proposed method provides more accurate (less conservative) and less scattered (more reliable) strength estimations as compared to the existing recommendation. Lastly, a complete design example of a drilled shaft footing subjected to different loading scenarios is provided in the Supplemental Materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-13976
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and Proposal of Strut-and-Tie Method for the Design of Drilled Shaft Footings

Juan Murcia‐Delso, Hyun su Kim, Yousun Yi, Jongkwon Choi et al.
Journal of Structural Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Evaluation and Proposal of Strut-and-Tie Method for the Design of Drilled Shaft Footings

Juan Murcia‐Delso, Hyun su Kim, Yousun Yi, Jongkwon Choi, Trevor D. Hrynyk, Oguzhan Bayrak
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a practical, accurate, and reasonably conservative procedure for the design and analysis of drilled shaft footings, also referred to as pile caps. A database of drilled shaft footing tests was compiled from the literature to evaluate the accuracy of an existing design guide based on the three-dimensional (3D) strut-and-tie method (STM). It was concluded that strength estimations obtained with the existing 3D STM-based design guidelines were excessively conservative, and the accuracy of the method varied with key design parameters such as strut inclination and drilled shaft size. Key enhancements to the 3D STM are proposed to resolve existing limitations and ambiguities, including the definition of tie area for bottom mat reinforcement, 3D nodal geometry, nodal strength, concrete efficiency factor, and tie anchorage checks. These recommendations are supported by experimental evidence, including data from large-scale footing tests recently conducted by the authors, and are consistent with current design code provisions. The proposed method provides more accurate (less conservative) and less scattered (more reliable) strength estimations as compared to the existing recommendation. Lastly, a complete design example of a drilled shaft footing subjected to different loading scenarios is provided in the Supplemental Materials.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 151(7)
University of Waterloo (CA), BMW of North America (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Hongik University (KR), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.