A polycrisis threat model for AI

Abstract A catastrophic AI threat model is a rigorous exploration of some particular mechanisms by which AI could potentially lead to catastrophic outcomes. In this article, I explore a polycrisis threat model. According to this model, AI will lead to a series of harms like disinformation and increased concentration of wealth and power. Interactions between these different harms will make things worse than they would have been had each harm operated in isolation. And the interacting harms will ultimately cause or constitute a catastrophe. My aim in this paper is not to defend the inevitability of such a polycrisis occurring. Instead, I aspire merely to establish that polycrisis-driven catastrophe is sufficiently plausible that it calls for further exploration. In doing so, I hope to emphasise that alongside worries about AI takeover, those concerned about catastrophic risk from AI should also take seriously worries about extreme power concentration and systemic disempowerment of humanity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02371-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A polycrisis threat model for AI

Adam Bales
1 citations
AI & Society
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
1.43
article

A polycrisis threat model for AI

Adam Bales
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A catastrophic AI threat model is a rigorous exploration of some particular mechanisms by which AI could potentially lead to catastrophic outcomes. In this article, I explore a polycrisis threat model. According to this model, AI will lead to a series of harms like disinformation and increased concentration of wealth and power. Interactions between these different harms will make things worse than they would have been had each harm operated in isolation. And the interacting harms will ultimately cause or constitute a catastrophe. My aim in this paper is not to defend the inevitability of such a polycrisis occurring. Instead, I aspire merely to establish that polycrisis-driven catastrophe is sufficiently plausible that it calls for further exploration. In doing so, I hope to emphasise that alongside worries about AI takeover, those concerned about catastrophic risk from AI should also take seriously worries about extreme power concentration and systemic disempowerment of humanity.

AI & SocietyVol. 40(8)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.