Validation of the 5th edition of the World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification guidelines for TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasm in an independent international cohort

The World Health Organization (WHO-5) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) acknowledge the poor prognosis of TP53-mutated (TP53<sup>mut</sup>) myeloid neoplasm (MN). However, there are substantial differences between the two classifications that may lead to under- or overestimation of the prognostic risk. We retrospectively applied WHO-5 and ICC to 603 MN cases harboring TP53<sup>mut</sup> (variant allele frequency, VAF ≥ 2%). WHO-5 and ICC would not classify 64% and 20% of these cases as TP53<sup>mut</sup> MN, respectively. Moreover, of those classified, 67.5% would be classified discrepantly. Primary drivers of discrepancies included: (i) prognostic importance of TP53<sup>mut</sup> acute myeloid leukemia (AML), (ii) interaction of the blast percentage and allelic status, (iii) 17p.13.1 deletion detected by cytogenetics, (iv) complex karyotype (CK) as multi-hit equivalent, and (v) TP53<sup>mut</sup> VAF threshold, we analyzed survival outcomes of each of these groups with an aim to provide clarity. TP53<sup>mut</sup> AML was associated with significantly poor survival compared to TP53-wild type TP53<sup>wt</sup> AML, myelodysplasia-related (AML, MR 4.7 vs. 18.3 months; P < 0.0001), supporting its inclusion within TP53<sup>mut</sup> MN as a distinct subentity. Secondly, the survival of TP53<sup>mut</sup> with blast 10-19% was poor regardless of the allelic status. Thirdly, for cases with a single TP53<sup>mut</sup> with VAF < 50%, 17p13.1 del or CK serve as practical surrogates of biallelic inactivation, obviating the need for an additional copy number analysis. Finally, TP53<sup>mut</sup> AML, MDS multi-hit/multi-hit equivalent with VAF < 10% had significantly poorer survival compared to TP53<sup>mut</sup> MDS VAF < 10% without CK and 17p del, and were comparable to those with VAF ≥ 10% (14.1 vs. 48.8 vs.7.8 months, P < 0.0001). Collectively, these findings address key areas of contention and provide valuable insights that will guide future revisions of the WHO and ICC classifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Cancer Journal
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01290-0
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the 5th edition of the World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification guidelines for TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasm in an independent international cohort

David T Yeung, Naseema Gangat, Antoine N. Saliba, Cecilia Y. Arana Yi et al.
5 citations
Blood Cancer Journal
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
8.85
article

Validation of the 5th edition of the World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification guidelines for TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasm in an independent international cohort

David T Yeung, Naseema Gangat, Antoine N. Saliba, Cecilia Y. Arana Yi, Aref Al‐Kali, Abhishek Avinash Mangaonkar, C. R. Toop, Ayalew Tefferi, Sharad Kumar, Mithun Vinod Shah, Monika Kutyna, James M. Foran, Attilio Orazi, Hamish S. Scott, Aasiya Matin, Anmol Baranwal, Dariusz Ladon, Kevin Hung, Devendra Hiwase, Christopher N Hahn, Chung Hoow Kok, Hassan B. Alkhateeb, Mehrdad Hefazi, Anna Brown, Daniel A. Arber, Mrinal M. Patnaik, Patricia T. Greipp, Talha Badar, Rong Lucy He, Kebede H. Begna, William J. Hogan, Danièl Thomas, Danielle Rud, Gauri Wechalekar, Dong Chen, Mark R. Litzow, Peter Bardy
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO-5) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) acknowledge the poor prognosis of TP53-mutated (TP53<sup>mut</sup>) myeloid neoplasm (MN). However, there are substantial differences between the two classifications that may lead to under- or overestimation of the prognostic risk. We retrospectively applied WHO-5 and ICC to 603 MN cases harboring TP53<sup>mut</sup> (variant allele frequency, VAF ≥ 2%). WHO-5 and ICC would not classify 64% and 20% of these cases as TP53<sup>mut</sup> MN, respectively. Moreover, of those classified, 67.5% would be classified discrepantly. Primary drivers of discrepancies included: (i) prognostic importance of TP53<sup>mut</sup> acute myeloid leukemia (AML), (ii) interaction of the blast percentage and allelic status, (iii) 17p.13.1 deletion detected by cytogenetics, (iv) complex karyotype (CK) as multi-hit equivalent, and (v) TP53<sup>mut</sup> VAF threshold, we analyzed survival outcomes of each of these groups with an aim to provide clarity. TP53<sup>mut</sup> AML was associated with significantly poor survival compared to TP53-wild type TP53<sup>wt</sup> AML, myelodysplasia-related (AML, MR 4.7 vs. 18.3 months; P < 0.0001), supporting its inclusion within TP53<sup>mut</sup> MN as a distinct subentity. Secondly, the survival of TP53<sup>mut</sup> with blast 10-19% was poor regardless of the allelic status. Thirdly, for cases with a single TP53<sup>mut</sup> with VAF < 50%, 17p13.1 del or CK serve as practical surrogates of biallelic inactivation, obviating the need for an additional copy number analysis. Finally, TP53<sup>mut</sup> AML, MDS multi-hit/multi-hit equivalent with VAF < 10% had significantly poorer survival compared to TP53<sup>mut</sup> MDS VAF < 10% without CK and 17p del, and were comparable to those with VAF ≥ 10% (14.1 vs. 48.8 vs.7.8 months, P < 0.0001). Collectively, these findings address key areas of contention and provide valuable insights that will guide future revisions of the WHO and ICC classifications.

Blood Cancer JournalVol. 15(1)
South Australia Pathology (AU), Texas Tech University (US), Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), Mayo Clinic (US), University of South Australia (AU), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU), Centre for Cancer Biology (AU), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), The University of Adelaide (AU), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Leukaemia Foundation, Cancer Australia, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
8.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.