Effectiveness of Vascular Catheter Removal Versus Retention in Non-ICU Patients with CRBSI or CABSI in Retrospective, Single-Center Study

Catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSIs) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The current practice favors the removal of vascular access devices (VADs); however, the evidence on this topic remains inconclusive. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality and catheter retention vs. removal in CABSI and CRBSI cases. A retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted at Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy (May 2021-December 2023), and it analyzed non-ICU adult patients with VADs diagnosed with CRBSIs or CABSIs. Clinical and microbiological data were collected to assess the outcomes based on catheter management. Among 1874 patients with VADs, 147 were included, with 164 VAD infection events (92 CABSIs and 72 CRBSIs). Overall, 35 (23.8%) patients with CABSIs and CRBSIs died. Out of those who retained the catheter 19 (35.8%) patients died, while among removal patients 16 (17%) died (<i>p</i> = 0.018). A <i>Candida</i> spp. isolation was found to be significantly associated with a higher likelihood of catheter removal (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Our findings suggest that, in non-ICU CRBSI and CABSI cases, VAD removal may be associated with improved outcomes when feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microorganisms
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051085
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Vascular Catheter Removal Versus Retention in Non-ICU Patients with CRBSI or CABSI in Retrospective, Single-Center Study

Claudia Conflitti, Maria Calloni, Spinello Antinori, Alba Taino et al.
1 citations
Microorganisms
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
article

Effectiveness of Vascular Catheter Removal Versus Retention in Non-ICU Patients with CRBSI or CABSI in Retrospective, Single-Center Study

Claudia Conflitti, Maria Calloni, Spinello Antinori, Alba Taino, Camilla Genovese, Beatrice Caloni, Chiara Cogliati, Fabio Borgonovo, Arianna Bartoli, Andrea Gori, Antonio Gidaro, Marta Colaneri, Antonella Foschi, Emanuele Palomba, Monica Schiavini, Rebecca Fattore, Francesco Casella, Lucia Galli, Giovanni De Capitani, Daniele Zizzo, Nicola Busatto, Giovanni Scaglione
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSIs) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The current practice favors the removal of vascular access devices (VADs); however, the evidence on this topic remains inconclusive. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality and catheter retention vs. removal in CABSI and CRBSI cases. A retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted at Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy (May 2021-December 2023), and it analyzed non-ICU adult patients with VADs diagnosed with CRBSIs or CABSIs. Clinical and microbiological data were collected to assess the outcomes based on catheter management. Among 1874 patients with VADs, 147 were included, with 164 VAD infection events (92 CABSIs and 72 CRBSIs). Overall, 35 (23.8%) patients with CABSIs and CRBSIs died. Out of those who retained the catheter 19 (35.8%) patients died, while among removal patients 16 (17%) died (<i>p</i> = 0.018). A <i>Candida</i> spp. isolation was found to be significantly associated with a higher likelihood of catheter removal (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Our findings suggest that, in non-ICU CRBSI and CABSI cases, VAD removal may be associated with improved outcomes when feasible.

MicroorganismsVol. 13(5)
University of Milan (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Luigi Sacco Hospital (IT), ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.