A Multi‐Objective Framework for Regional Ecological Planning: Restoration Prioritization Analysis

ABSTRACT Ecosystem management initiatives remain far from achieving sustainable development targets, with degraded ecosystems significantly limiting the protection efficiency. This study proposes a multi‐objective framework for ecological restoration that complements existing protected areas and identifies priority areas for restoration to enhance effectiveness and sustainability within resource constraints. Focusing on a representative ecologically fragile county on the Loess Plateau, this study assessed ecosystem services (ESs) and applied the Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) model to delineate targeted protection areas. Following this, restoration objectives were established based on regional conservation requirements, accompanied by the development of a multi‐objective framework and corresponding scenarios. These scenarios aimed to maximize protection efficiency, improve ecological importance and landscape connectivity, while minimizing human activities impacts. Lastly, regional ecological security patterns were constructed to identify restoration sources, corridors, and barriers, as well as prioritize restoration areas into four levels. Key findings revealed that three scenarios offered the highest trade‐off and protection efficiency, respectively, selected as targeted protection areas under the hypothetical objectives. Regions characterized by higher ESs and lower human activity, encompassing one‐third of the total area, exhibited lower restoration costs. Restoration priorities covered 15.25%–26.83% of the study area, with 8–19 barriers identified in agricultural and construction zones, emphasizing the imperative for land‐use conversion to forests or grasslands. These findings provide actionable strategies for harmonizing ecological conservation with socio‐economic imperatives, highlighting the importance of tiered protection and targeted interventions to enhance restoration effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5591
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi‐Objective Framework for Regional Ecological Planning: Restoration Prioritization Analysis

Mingjie Qian, Yao Li, Juan He, Wei Zhou et al.
3 citations
Land Degradation and Development
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
article

A Multi‐Objective Framework for Regional Ecological Planning: Restoration Prioritization Analysis

Mingjie Qian, Yao Li, Juan He, Wei Zhou, Xueyi Shi, Enmao Zha
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ecosystem management initiatives remain far from achieving sustainable development targets, with degraded ecosystems significantly limiting the protection efficiency. This study proposes a multi‐objective framework for ecological restoration that complements existing protected areas and identifies priority areas for restoration to enhance effectiveness and sustainability within resource constraints. Focusing on a representative ecologically fragile county on the Loess Plateau, this study assessed ecosystem services (ESs) and applied the Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) model to delineate targeted protection areas. Following this, restoration objectives were established based on regional conservation requirements, accompanied by the development of a multi‐objective framework and corresponding scenarios. These scenarios aimed to maximize protection efficiency, improve ecological importance and landscape connectivity, while minimizing human activities impacts. Lastly, regional ecological security patterns were constructed to identify restoration sources, corridors, and barriers, as well as prioritize restoration areas into four levels. Key findings revealed that three scenarios offered the highest trade‐off and protection efficiency, respectively, selected as targeted protection areas under the hypothetical objectives. Regions characterized by higher ESs and lower human activity, encompassing one‐third of the total area, exhibited lower restoration costs. Restoration priorities covered 15.25%–26.83% of the study area, with 8–19 barriers identified in agricultural and construction zones, emphasizing the imperative for land‐use conversion to forests or grasslands. These findings provide actionable strategies for harmonizing ecological conservation with socio‐economic imperatives, highlighting the importance of tiered protection and targeted interventions to enhance restoration effectiveness.

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 36(11)
Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center (CN), University of Twente (NL)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.