Research of Improving the Service Quality of Home-Care Long-Term Care Institutions

The research aims to analyze the empirical data of the evaluation results from home-care long-term care (LTC) service institutions to understand the status of home-care institutions in Taiwan. Based on the results of analysis will be used as an empirical study to revise the evaluation benchmark in 2026. Based on the on-site evaluation results of 50 home-based LTC institutions, 26% excellent (evaluation score ≧ 85), and 14% un-qualified (evaluation score < 70). The results were based on the "coincidence rate to be improved" as the key failure factors (KFF) of home-based LTC institutions. Compared with the consensus benchmark of each concept, KFF accounted for 60% of the professional care quality concept, indicating that the professional care quality profile had a significant impact on the evaluation results of home-based LTC institutions. Suggested that home-care institutions integrate cross-disciplinary resource differences based on self-improvement and case-based in response to the evaluation preparation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.1544
Primary Topic
Medical Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research of Improving the Service Quality of Home-Care Long-Term Care Institutions

Jui-Ying Hung
Journal of Posthumanism
Medical Research and Treatments
article

Research of Improving the Service Quality of Home-Care Long-Term Care Institutions

Jui-Ying Hung
article en

Abstract

The research aims to analyze the empirical data of the evaluation results from home-care long-term care (LTC) service institutions to understand the status of home-care institutions in Taiwan. Based on the results of analysis will be used as an empirical study to revise the evaluation benchmark in 2026. Based on the on-site evaluation results of 50 home-based LTC institutions, 26% excellent (evaluation score ≧ 85), and 14% un-qualified (evaluation score < 70). The results were based on the "coincidence rate to be improved" as the key failure factors (KFF) of home-based LTC institutions. Compared with the consensus benchmark of each concept, KFF accounted for 60% of the professional care quality concept, indicating that the professional care quality profile had a significant impact on the evaluation results of home-based LTC institutions. Suggested that home-care institutions integrate cross-disciplinary resource differences based on self-improvement and case-based in response to the evaluation preparation.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Medical Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.