Governance Models and Decision-Making Structures in Higher Education

This article explores the critical governance models and decision-making structures that underpin higher education institutions. It begins with an overview of different governance models, including the traditional collegial model, managerial model, shared governance model, and network governance model. Each model's features, benefits, and challenges are discussed to provide a comprehensive understanding of their application in higher education. The article then examines key decision-making structures such as boards of trustees or regents, university presidents or chancellors, academic senates, administrative committees, and student governments. By balancing efficiency with broad participation, these governance frameworks ensure the effective and inclusive management of higher education institutions. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for adaptable governance structures to meet evolving challenges and opportunities in the higher education landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Science Engineering and Management Bulletin [ASEMB]
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69889/asemb.v1i1(oct-dec).18
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance Models and Decision-Making Structures in Higher Education

Mohammad Esmaeil Zadeh, Sami Hussein
Applied Science Engineering and Management Bulletin [ASEMB]
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Governance Models and Decision-Making Structures in Higher Education

Mohammad Esmaeil Zadeh, Sami Hussein
article en

Abstract

This article explores the critical governance models and decision-making structures that underpin higher education institutions. It begins with an overview of different governance models, including the traditional collegial model, managerial model, shared governance model, and network governance model. Each model's features, benefits, and challenges are discussed to provide a comprehensive understanding of their application in higher education. The article then examines key decision-making structures such as boards of trustees or regents, university presidents or chancellors, academic senates, administrative committees, and student governments. By balancing efficiency with broad participation, these governance frameworks ensure the effective and inclusive management of higher education institutions. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for adaptable governance structures to meet evolving challenges and opportunities in the higher education landscape.

Applied Science Engineering and Management Bulletin [ASEMB]Vol. 1(1(Oct-Dec))
Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Governance Models and Decision-Making Structures in Higher Education — Mohammad Esmaeil Zadeh, Sami Hussein · Applied Science Engineering and Management Bulletin [ASEMB] (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS