The Role of Reputation and Regulation in Shaping Non-Financial Information Reporting

This study explores how corporate reputation and regulation influence the quantity and quality of non-financial information (NFI) disclosure. While internal drivers of NFI reporting are well-studied, external pressures remain underexplored. Analyzing Ibex35 firms (2015–2019) during Spain’s adoption of Directive 2014/95/EU, the study uses panel data analysis to assess the impact of reputation and regulation on NFI reporting. The findings show that highly reputed firms disclose more extensive and higher-quality NFI, while regulatory changes significantly improve both variables of NFI reporting. Thus, firms go beyond mere compliance. By distinguishing between quality and quantity, the study clarifies conflicting prior findings and highlights the complementary roles of reputation and regulation in fostering transparency. The results offer valuable insights for managers and policymakers, enhancing stakeholder trust and the effectiveness of regulation in promoting corporate transparency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administrative Sciences
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050174
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Reputation and Regulation in Shaping Non-Financial Information Reporting

Sergio Camisón-Haba, Melanie Grueso‐Gala
1 citations
Administrative Sciences
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

The Role of Reputation and Regulation in Shaping Non-Financial Information Reporting

Sergio Camisón-Haba, Melanie Grueso‐Gala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explores how corporate reputation and regulation influence the quantity and quality of non-financial information (NFI) disclosure. While internal drivers of NFI reporting are well-studied, external pressures remain underexplored. Analyzing Ibex35 firms (2015–2019) during Spain’s adoption of Directive 2014/95/EU, the study uses panel data analysis to assess the impact of reputation and regulation on NFI reporting. The findings show that highly reputed firms disclose more extensive and higher-quality NFI, while regulatory changes significantly improve both variables of NFI reporting. Thus, firms go beyond mere compliance. By distinguishing between quality and quantity, the study clarifies conflicting prior findings and highlights the complementary roles of reputation and regulation in fostering transparency. The results offer valuable insights for managers and policymakers, enhancing stakeholder trust and the effectiveness of regulation in promoting corporate transparency.

Administrative SciencesVol. 15(5)
Universitat de València (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Reputation and Regulation in Shaping Non-Financial Information Reporting — Sergio Camisón-Haba, Melanie Grueso‐Gala · Administrative Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS