Behavioral biases and organizational learning: a cognitive perspective
Purpose The paper aims to explore how cognitive biases influence the way organizations learn and adapt. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a viewpoint methodology to explore the influence of behavioral biases on organizational learning. It synthesizes insights from behavioral science, psychology, and organizational learning theories to provide a conceptual discussion. The paper identifies and discusses key biases that impact decision-making and learning processes within organizations. Findings This work synthesizes the different biases that hinder organizational learning. The different steps that an organization can take to mitigate or decrease the impact of these biases are also discussed Research limitations/implications The paper focuses on key cognitive biases only in an organizational context while ignoring other organizational and individual factors such as individual experiences, cultural background, size of the organization. Practical implications Organization must recognize and address the cognitive biases which promote learning and adaptability. Failure to it can lead to flawed decision-making, resistance to change and hinder organizational growth. Implementing corrective mitigation strategies is crucial for fostering a culture of interdependency, exploring newer avenues in tackling situations and efficient use of resources. This helps an organization to adapt to the dynamic business environment and maintain competitive advantage. Originality/value This is the first study in which key biases and organizational learning are discussed, which is beneficial for the organization to understand and implement for better organizational success on time.
Authors
- Sonali Jain
- Jasmine Joseph (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-5210)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
- Published
- 2025-05-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-12-2024-0356
- Primary Topic
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00