A Comparative Analysis of Fluorescence Properties in Composite Restorative Materials: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study

In the field of dentistry, achieving a natural look in dental restorations is crucial. This relies significantly on the ability of composite materials to mimic the optical characteristics of natural teeth, particularly their fluorescence. Fluorescence plays a vital role in giving teeth their lifelike appearance and varies widely among different materials, impacting their long-term performance in clinical settings. This study aims to assess and compare the fluorescence properties of four advanced composite restorative materials against natural dental enamel through both laboratory and clinical evaluations. The research involved an in vitro examination of 50 samples categorized into five groups, with one control group (natural dental enamel) and four experimental groups (G-Aenial, GC Essentia, Brilliant Flo, and Omnichroma). Fluorescence intensity was measured both visually and through photographic techniques immediately after application and again after 30 days. Furthermore, a randomized clinical trial was conducted with 40 participants to evaluate the in vivo fluorescence of these composites used in cervical restorations. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. The analysis revealed significant differences in fluorescence levels across all groups (p < 0.05). Among the composites tested, Omnichroma exhibited the closest resemblance to natural enamel fluorescence at both baseline and after 30 days, with p-values of 0.01 for in vitro and 0.02 for in vivo assessments. Notably, all composite materials, except for the control group (natural enamel), showed a decrease in fluorescence over time, with G-Aenial and GC Essentia experiencing more pronounced reductions compared to Omnichroma (p = 0.03). Omnichroma was found to most effectively replicate the fluorescence of natural enamel, leading to better esthetic results. However, it is important to note that all composite materials demonstrated a decline in fluorescence over time, indicating a need for ongoing development to enhance their durability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composites Science
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9050236
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Fluorescence Properties in Composite Restorative Materials: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study

Unmesh Khanvilkar, Luca Testarelli, Ajinkya M. Pawar, Rodolfo Reda et al.
3 citations
Journal of Composites Science
Dental materials and restorations
5.03
article

A Comparative Analysis of Fluorescence Properties in Composite Restorative Materials: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study

Unmesh Khanvilkar, Luca Testarelli, Ajinkya M. Pawar, Rodolfo Reda, Sunaina Khandelwal, Anuj Bhardwaj, Shivangi Trivedi, Dario Di Nardo, Surekha Bhat
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In the field of dentistry, achieving a natural look in dental restorations is crucial. This relies significantly on the ability of composite materials to mimic the optical characteristics of natural teeth, particularly their fluorescence. Fluorescence plays a vital role in giving teeth their lifelike appearance and varies widely among different materials, impacting their long-term performance in clinical settings. This study aims to assess and compare the fluorescence properties of four advanced composite restorative materials against natural dental enamel through both laboratory and clinical evaluations. The research involved an in vitro examination of 50 samples categorized into five groups, with one control group (natural dental enamel) and four experimental groups (G-Aenial, GC Essentia, Brilliant Flo, and Omnichroma). Fluorescence intensity was measured both visually and through photographic techniques immediately after application and again after 30 days. Furthermore, a randomized clinical trial was conducted with 40 participants to evaluate the in vivo fluorescence of these composites used in cervical restorations. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. The analysis revealed significant differences in fluorescence levels across all groups (p < 0.05). Among the composites tested, Omnichroma exhibited the closest resemblance to natural enamel fluorescence at both baseline and after 30 days, with p-values of 0.01 for in vitro and 0.02 for in vivo assessments. Notably, all composite materials, except for the control group (natural enamel), showed a decrease in fluorescence over time, with G-Aenial and GC Essentia experiencing more pronounced reductions compared to Omnichroma (p = 0.03). Omnichroma was found to most effectively replicate the fluorescence of natural enamel, leading to better esthetic results. However, it is important to note that all composite materials demonstrated a decline in fluorescence over time, indicating a need for ongoing development to enhance their durability.

Journal of Composites ScienceVol. 9(5)
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (IN), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Ragas Dental College & Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental materials and restorations
5.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.