Jeremy Bentham and the Neoclassical and Neoliberal Traditions: Architect or Adversary?

This article reclaims Jeremy Bentham from the trend of characterizing him as an intellectual inspiration for neoclassicism and neoliberalism. It demonstrates that, although Bentham’s early thought subscribed to both ontological and methodological individualism, he later revised this perspective. In the early 19th century, Bentham developed a theory of ‘psychological dynamics’, asserting self-interest as a universal axiom. Individuals calculate their interests within historically situated power dynamics, influenced by their social location. This insight led Bentham to construct a theory of social ontology in which individual development was conceived as co-constitutive with social structures. Institutions were reconceptualized as vestiges of elite interests, necessitating radical constitutional reform. Thus, while Bentham’s early work provided a methodological framework later appropriated by neoclassicism and neoliberalism, his mature thought aligns more closely with the radical traditions of the 19th and 20th centuries, making him the antithesis of the neoliberal worldview.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory Culture & Society
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251326520
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jeremy Bentham and the Neoclassical and Neoliberal Traditions: Architect or Adversary?

Tom McDowell
Theory Culture & Society
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

Jeremy Bentham and the Neoclassical and Neoliberal Traditions: Architect or Adversary?

Tom McDowell
article en

Abstract

This article reclaims Jeremy Bentham from the trend of characterizing him as an intellectual inspiration for neoclassicism and neoliberalism. It demonstrates that, although Bentham’s early thought subscribed to both ontological and methodological individualism, he later revised this perspective. In the early 19th century, Bentham developed a theory of ‘psychological dynamics’, asserting self-interest as a universal axiom. Individuals calculate their interests within historically situated power dynamics, influenced by their social location. This insight led Bentham to construct a theory of social ontology in which individual development was conceived as co-constitutive with social structures. Institutions were reconceptualized as vestiges of elite interests, necessitating radical constitutional reform. Thus, while Bentham’s early work provided a methodological framework later appropriated by neoclassicism and neoliberalism, his mature thought aligns more closely with the radical traditions of the 19th and 20th centuries, making him the antithesis of the neoliberal worldview.

Theory Culture & SocietyVol. 42(5)
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Jeremy Bentham and the Neoclassical and Neoliberal Traditions: Architect or Adversary? — Tom McDowell · Theory Culture & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS