Extremal maximal entanglement

A pure multipartite quantum state is called absolutely maximally entangled if all reductions of no more than half of the parties are maximally mixed. However, an $n$-qubit absolutely maximally entangled state exists only when $n$ equals 2, 3, 5, and 6. A natural question arises when it does not exist: Which $n$-qubit pure state has the largest number of maximally mixed $\ensuremath{\lfloor}n/2\ensuremath{\rfloor}$-party reductions? We denote this number by $\mathrm{Qex}(n)$. It was shown that $\mathrm{Qex}(4)=4$ by Higuchi and Sudbery [Phys. Lett. A 273, 213 (2000)] and $\mathrm{Qex}(7)=32$ by Huber et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 200502 (2017)]. In this paper, we give a general upper bound of $\mathrm{Qex}(n)$ by linking the well-known Tur\'an problem in graph theory and provide lower bounds using constructive and probabilistic methods. In particular, we show that $\mathrm{Qex}(8)=56$, which is the third known value for this problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.111.052410
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extremal maximal entanglement

Fei Shi, Yu Ning, Xiande Zhang, Wanchen Zhang
3 citations
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Quantum Information and Cryptography
7.44
article

Extremal maximal entanglement

Fei Shi, Yu Ning, Xiande Zhang, Wanchen Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A pure multipartite quantum state is called absolutely maximally entangled if all reductions of no more than half of the parties are maximally mixed. However, an $n$-qubit absolutely maximally entangled state exists only when $n$ equals 2, 3, 5, and 6. A natural question arises when it does not exist: Which $n$-qubit pure state has the largest number of maximally mixed $\ensuremath{\lfloor}n/2\ensuremath{\rfloor}$-party reductions? We denote this number by $\mathrm{Qex}(n)$. It was shown that $\mathrm{Qex}(4)=4$ by Higuchi and Sudbery [Phys. Lett. A 273, 213 (2000)] and $\mathrm{Qex}(7)=32$ by Huber et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 200502 (2017)]. In this paper, we give a general upper bound of $\mathrm{Qex}(n)$ by linking the well-known Tur\'an problem in graph theory and provide lower bounds using constructive and probabilistic methods. In particular, we show that $\mathrm{Qex}(8)=56$, which is the third known value for this problem.

Physical review. A/Physical review, AVol. 111(5)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, University of Hong Kong, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Extremal maximal entanglement — Fei Shi, Yu Ning, et al. · Physical review. A/Physical review, A (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS