A Perfect-Model Perspective on the Signal-to-Noise Paradox in Initialized Decadal Predictions

Abstract Initialized climate predictions have shown success in predicting interannual-to-decadal climate variations in some regions. However, the initialized predictions also suffer from different issues arising from imperfect initializations and inconsistencies between the model and the real-world climate and processes. In particular, a so-called signal-to-noise paradox has been identified in recent years. The paradox implies that models can predict observations better than they predict themselves despite some physical inconsistencies between modeled and real-world climate. This is often interpreted as an indicator of model deficiencies. Here, we present results of a perfect-model decadal prediction experiment, where the predictions have been initialized using climate states from the model’s own transient simulation. This experiment avoids issues related to model inconsistencies, initialization shock, and the climate drift that affect real-world initialized climate predictions. We find that the perfect-model decadal predictions are highly skillful in predicting the near-surface air temperature and sea level pressure of the reference run on decadal time scales. Interestingly, we also find signal-to-noise issues—meaning that the perfect-model reference run is predicted with higher skill than any of the initialized prediction members. This counterintuitive result suggests that the signal-to-noise paradox may not be due just to model deficiencies in representing the observed climate in initialized predictions. We illustrate that this signal-to-noise problem, on multiannual-to-decadal time scales, is related to analysis practices that concatenate time series from different discontinuous initialized simulations, which introduces inconsistencies compared to the continuous transient climate realizations and the observations. In particular, the concatenation of predictions initialized independently into a single time series breaks its autocorrelation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-24-0381.1
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Perfect-Model Perspective on the Signal-to-Noise Paradox in Initialized Decadal Predictions

Rashed Mahmood, Étienne Tourigny, Markus G. Donat, Francisco J. Doblas‐Reyes
Journal of Climate
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
article

A Perfect-Model Perspective on the Signal-to-Noise Paradox in Initialized Decadal Predictions

Rashed Mahmood, Étienne Tourigny, Markus G. Donat, Francisco J. Doblas‐Reyes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Initialized climate predictions have shown success in predicting interannual-to-decadal climate variations in some regions. However, the initialized predictions also suffer from different issues arising from imperfect initializations and inconsistencies between the model and the real-world climate and processes. In particular, a so-called signal-to-noise paradox has been identified in recent years. The paradox implies that models can predict observations better than they predict themselves despite some physical inconsistencies between modeled and real-world climate. This is often interpreted as an indicator of model deficiencies. Here, we present results of a perfect-model decadal prediction experiment, where the predictions have been initialized using climate states from the model’s own transient simulation. This experiment avoids issues related to model inconsistencies, initialization shock, and the climate drift that affect real-world initialized climate predictions. We find that the perfect-model decadal predictions are highly skillful in predicting the near-surface air temperature and sea level pressure of the reference run on decadal time scales. Interestingly, we also find signal-to-noise issues—meaning that the perfect-model reference run is predicted with higher skill than any of the initialized prediction members. This counterintuitive result suggests that the signal-to-noise paradox may not be due just to model deficiencies in representing the observed climate in initialized predictions. We illustrate that this signal-to-noise problem, on multiannual-to-decadal time scales, is related to analysis practices that concatenate time series from different discontinuous initialized simulations, which introduces inconsistencies compared to the continuous transient climate realizations and the observations. In particular, the concatenation of predictions initialized independently into a single time series breaks its autocorrelation.

Journal of ClimateVol. 38(12)
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES), Danish Meteorological Institute (DK), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.